My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
08/29/2023 Special
>
Correspondence - #21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2023 12:56:43 PM
Creation date
8/28/2023 3:28:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
8/29/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DOWDALL LAW OFFICES <br />A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />City of Santa Ana <br />August 28, 2023 <br />Page 5 <br />anti -Democratic frolic of a city Council. Why are the voters paying costs assessed against the <br />city of Santa Ana as a proximate result of Santa Ana's malevolent efforts to squelch the <br />taxpayers constitutional right to vote? <br />The Proposal Violates Due Process Of Law: <br />The proposal is bereft of a rational basis. There are no findings to justify eliminating <br />democratic principles guaranteed in the charter. According to the agenda packet, <br />Since its adoption, rent stabilization ordinances have been contemplated and <br />adopted throughout the United States. Most recently, the White House lauded <br />Santa Ana's Rental Registry as a model for supporting renters who are <br />increasingly facing evictions, homelessness, and displacement due to <br />skyrocketing rents.5 <br />Objection is made to each and every recital set forth in the proposed ordinance. The <br />foregoing is, in fact, a false statement in respect to mobilehome parks located in the city of Santa <br />Ana, and generally for the socioeconomic condition of mobile home tenants throughout the state <br />of California. It is especially untrue with regard to residents who have selected the stability of <br />long-term leases which provide life estate protections and rights of inheritance that continue into <br />perpetuity and for so long as a mobilehome park remains in operation and existence. This has <br />been empirically demonstrated in peer -reviewed scientific data which shows that the political <br />pronouncements of the White House are groundless. As such, reliance upon this information as a <br />basis for passage of the ordinance is misplaced and fails to provide a rational justification for <br />action in this instance. <br />In response to the fabricated recitals tenderness factual underpinnings for the proposed <br />ordinance, I submit that according to the Brookings Institution', steadily rising housing rents in <br />many large, productive U.S. Cities have reignited the discussion whether to expand or enact rent <br />control provisions, certainly. <br />5 Citing, The White House, "White House Fact Sheet: Biden-Harris Administration Takes <br />Action to Protect Renters," accessed July 27, 2023, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/ <br />statements-releases/2023/07/27/fact-sheetbiden-harris-administration-takes-action-to-pro <br />tectrenters/#: -: text=Santa%20Ana's%20new%20rental%20registry, and%20supports%20to%20q <br />ualified%20households. <br />' https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-does-economic -evidence-tell-us-about-the- <br />effects-of-rent-control/ (Rebecca Diamond, Associate Professor of Economics, Stanford <br />Graduate School of Business). <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.