Laserfiche WebLink
votes <br />Institutional support for Palestine before Hamas is unseated means institutional support for Hamas. <br />I REPEAT Institutional support for Palestine before Hamas is unseated means institutional support for Hamas. <br />Hamas, the terrorist organization, classified by OSCE and the United States as a terrorist organization. <br />Hamas is still in charge of the Health Ministry of Gaza and the Education Ministry of Gaza. Which is why <br />Hamas leaders are billionaires, because each time a war happens they receive billions of dollars in aid that goes <br />to them instead of to the Palestinians. Which is also why Gaza looks like an open air wasteland instead of <br />something like Singapore and also why you won't necessarily be helping Palestians by supporting Gaza. <br />Demanding a ceasefire is not only irresponsible towards Israelis who only aim to protect themselves from what <br />has been recognized by the ICC's prosecutor as gross human rights violations, but is also irresponsible towards <br />the Palestinians who are living under what can only be described as a terrorist regime if one aims to be accurate <br />with their language. <br />Your proposal antisemitically mentions words being used to show a clear intention of ethnic cleansing on behalf <br />of Israel, and ignores actions, specifically the actions of directly targeting elderly and child civilians in a mass <br />shooting, raping, beheading and brutalizing attack on October 7th, the actions done by HAMAS as an ACTUAL <br />attempt at ethnic cleansing. <br />I know weed is legalized there now but you shouldn't be writing law while under the influence. <br />Your proposal also claims to combat antisemitism while ignoring the 1.2 million Jewish California <br />residents.Who by the way are very present in email communications opposing this proposal last I checked 142 <br />residents opposing this proposal, to only 2 in favor, probably associated with the two drug addicts that <br />suggested the proposal Yes I read all the emails. <br />Such a text like the one suggested in agenda item 19, as a proposal, has no credibility in the eyes of the truthful. <br />If you think a simple vote means nothing, I don't know why you would bother being council members. You <br />have a responsibility to the truth you so openly claim to value on your website. I hope to see you take that <br />responsibility seriously, because there are lives that can die when you don't. <br />Do the right thing and stand behind the Geneva Convention or I will question why you don't, with every <br />resource at my disposal. <br />19 <br />