My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 26 - Public Hearing Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
01/16/2024 Regular & Special HA & Special SA
>
Item 26 - Public Hearing Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 11:33:12 AM
Creation date
1/23/2024 11:31:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
26
Date
1/16/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
670
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project <br />CEQA Exemption 15183 <br />4.5.2 Project Analysis <br />The project site is located within the western portion of the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus <br />Area and does not contain any historical resources as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15064.5(a). Thus, no impacts would occur with regards to historical resources. <br />Although the project would redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the <br />site into an outdoor community garden, play field, and play yard, the proposed project would not <br />require extensive excavation that could uncover previously undiscovered archaeological <br />resources or disturb human remains. Typical excavation depth would be a maximum of four feet <br />for the majority of the site with the deepest excavation of approximately eight feet for an <br />underground infiltration chamber related to stormwater improvements. RR CUL-1 requires that if <br />human remains are discovered within the project site, disturbance of the site must halt until the <br />County coroner has investigated and recommended treatment and disposition of the remains. If <br />the human remains are determined to be Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage <br />Commission must be contacted. Upon implementation of RR CUL-1, impacts would be less than <br />significant in these regards. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared <br />to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. <br />4.5.3 Conclusion <br />As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR CUL- <br />1, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or <br />the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative <br />impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more <br />severe cultural resource impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. <br />Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: <br />RR CUL-1 California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains <br />are discovered within the proposed project site, disturbance of the site shall halt <br />and remain halted until the coroner has investigated the circumstances, manner, <br />and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and <br />disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for <br />the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative. If the coroner determines <br />that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes <br />or has reason to believe the human remains to be those of a Native American, he <br />or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage <br />Commission. <br />4.6 Energy <br />4.6.1 GPU EIR Findings <br />The GPU EIR determined that implementation of the General Plan Update policies, in conjunction <br />with regulatory requirements, would ensure that energy demand associated with growth under <br />the General Plan Update would not be inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. Additionally, the <br />General Plan Update would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy <br />or energy efficiency. <br />Dec i y ouncil 26 — 82 1/16/20'2 e 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.