My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Review Follow-Up
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
02/20/2024
>
Agenda Review Follow-Up
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2024 7:59:32 AM
Creation date
2/22/2024 1:28:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
2/20/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff received a concern that one councilmember had three Aide agreements that <br />appear to exceed the maximum amounts. Daniel has provided the following. At the Feb. <br />20, 2024 meeting, the City Council will be presented with amendments to three <br />agreements for City Council Aide consultancy services: one for Claudia Perez (the <br />Mayor's contracted aide), one for Valerie Magdaleno (Councilmember Lopez's <br />contracted aide), and one for Andrew Linares (Councilmember Bacerra's contracted <br />aide). To be transparent, in the staff report a table was included with an overview of all <br />agreements for contracted aides. A councilmember reviewed the staff report and noted <br />that there are three contracted aides for Councilmember Vazquez, totaling an amount <br />not to exceed $85,000. Three things: (1) the not -to -exceed amount of $85,000 does not <br />mean that we expect to expend $85,000; rather, the $85,000 allows flexibility in seeking <br />services using any of the three agreements (i.e., we may expend more from one <br />agreement than from another); (2) so far, we have only expended $1,567.50 in city <br />council aide consultancy services for Councilmember Vazquez; and (3) regardless of <br />the not -to -exceed amounts for these agreements, the City Council approved a budget of <br />$60,000 to be used for city council aide consultancy services per councilmember—the <br />City Manager's Office oversees this budget, tracks these agreements, and makes sure <br />that no councilmember exceeds the $60,000 allocation for their contracted aides. <br />5. Agenda Item No. 38 - Food and Beverage Services at Santa Ana Zoo <br />Staff received concern that the percentage share appeared low. Hawk and his team <br />have provided the following back up. Outreach/Solicitation Efforts: During the recent <br />concessions RFP process zoo staff reached out to the downtown businesses and did <br />extensive research on vendors that provide concessions at zoo and museum <br />facilities. Those vendors included groups like SSA (services at numerous zoos like LA <br />Zoo), Patina Group (Bowers Museum), Aramark, Delaware North, the food vendor for <br />Chapman University, and others. Despite direct emails and outreach to as many <br />relatable businesses as we could find, we only received one proposal from the current <br />concessionaire, Bean Sprouts. At the job walk the owners of the McFadden Public <br />Market were interested in bidding but ultimately said it wasn't profitable enough. Bean <br />Sprouts: Bean Sprouts is currently at the zoo and Discovery Cube and has a number of <br />other installations (both owned and franchised) at other zoos and museums. Bean <br />Sprouts has no prior experience with alcohol sales at their other facilities and this <br />venture will be a learning experience for them as well as the city. Bean Sprouts did <br />request the City keep their revenue share numbers confidential because they stated <br />they are more generous than some of their other facilities. City staff advised it is public <br />record. Because Bean Sprouts was the only proposer we didn't really have leverage to <br />negotiate aggressive revenue share and their numbers were consistent with our past <br />agreement. Previous Alcohol Sales Agreement: The City did pursue a RFP solely for <br />alcohol sales a couple years ago and received a small number of bids at the time. The <br />most competitive proposal, and the one we selected, provided a 20% revenue share for <br />alcohol sales. This vendor was never able to successfully receive an ABC license <br />despite assertions they could. Working closer with the ABC office city staff learned they <br />couldn't receive the license because they didn't operate the on -site kitchen and the ABC <br />wouldn't accept a situation with a separate contracted food operator. Revenue Share: <br />Based on information we could find, restaurant profits are not very high and according <br />to Toast average 3-5%. https:Hpos.toasttab.com/blog/on-the-line/average-restaurant- <br />profit-margin We have learned a lot over the past few years and any original assertions <br />don't appear correct. Golf Course Comparison: As this was not used in negotiation of <br />this contract. We get 2% of all beer sales. Attached is the latest one I have but could get <br />the most recent one. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.