My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #18
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
03/05/2024
>
Correspondence - #18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2024 12:01:53 PM
Creation date
2/28/2024 2:42:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
3/5/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
By the way, will you also provide the number of Palestinians that Hamas has killed since 2005. There were a few they killed <br />when they accidentally fired a rocket at one of their hospitals recently. I must say that most Palestinians that Hamas has killed <br />has been intentional. <br />2. The Requested Item Report mentions that, "over 25,000 innocent Palestinian civilians", have been killed. Many people have <br />lost their lives and that is tragic. It is well documented that civilians (non-Hamas members) assisted Hamas on October 7th and <br />beyond. I think it is difficult to call all 25,000 of those people as "innocent". Further, I assume that the 25,000 number includes <br />members of Hamas. Again, that is an assumption of mine. How do you know that all 25,000 people are "innocent"? <br />3. The Requested Item Report affirms city "support for an immediate ceasefire resolution, where the state of Israel declares a <br />permanent ceasefire over Gaza...". The resolution is titled 'A Resolution of the City Council of Santa Ana, California Affirming <br />Support for the worldwide call for an Immediate Ceasefire in Gaza'. It is abhorrent that these documents only support a one- <br />sided ceasefire. Hamas is on record by saying they will commit more October 7th style attacks on Israel in the future. It is well <br />documented. Yet, based on how your documents are written, the city of Santa Ana would be fine with that sort of attack again. <br />Those types of attacks will not stand and I am in favor of Israel destroying Hamas to save future Israeli lives. These documents <br />drip with anti-Semitic and anti -Israel notions. <br />I'm glad the resolution language calls for the release of hostages and I think everyone wants a ceasefire. The underlying issue <br />here is that if you approve this type of resolution, the pro-Palestinian/Hamas folks will spin it as if the the City of Santa Ana <br />outright condemns and blames Israel for what is happening. Based on the title of the resolution, I suppose they could make that <br />leap. Anecdotally, after a lot of research, the City of Long Beach passed a very vanilla, down -the -fairway resolution and the pro- <br />Palestinian/Hamas folks have twisted it with the media as if it is a document that condemns Israel. <br />Please do not become a pawn. Please do not pass a ceasefire resolution. <br />Thank you. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.