My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 21 - Memorandum of Understanding with OCTA and City of Irvine
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
04/16/2024
>
Item 21 - Memorandum of Understanding with OCTA and City of Irvine
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2024 2:38:06 PM
Creation date
4/16/2024 1:14:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
21
Date
4/16/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-1 OF 14 <br />A. <br />L <br />a 'Zfi IBC VISION PLAN 2o18 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE — <br />ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS <br />Final <br />3 ALTERNATIVE z -RED HILL AVENUE WIDENING (MAIN <br />STREET TO MACARTHUR BOULEVARD) <br />3.1 Introduction <br />The 2018 Traffic Study Update Alternative 2 is an analysis to observe the impacts of removing the one <br />remaining MPAH roadway network project within the IBC area; the widening of Red Hill Avenue from four to <br />six lanes between Main Street and MacArthur Boulevard. The location of this project is illustrated in Figure <br />1.2. <br />For this analysis, the Buildout Cumulative With Update is assumed to be the No Project (Baseline) scenario <br />and the Alternative 2 scenario is the With Project scenario. Traffic analysis is performed using the same <br />methodology employed for the Interim and Buildout year analysis. Any forecast deficiency locations are <br />identified, together with identification of the most effective improvement measures to mitigate them. <br />The transportation networks are consistent between these two future scenarios except for one exception, <br />the Alternative 2 scenario removes the Red Hill Avenue widening project currently in the MPAH that would <br />widen the arterial to six lanes between Main Street and MacArthur Boulevard. The Alternative 2 scenario <br />assumes Red Hill Avenue in the project area to have the same configuration as existing conditions. <br />In order to isolate the effects of removing the Red Hill widening to traffic patterns in the study area, the <br />Alternative 2 scenario has the identical land -use as Buildout With Update. <br />3.2 Alternative 2 Daily Arterial Segment Analysis <br />The Alternative 2 traffic patterns generally remain very similar to the Buildout With Update scenario traffic <br />patterns. The vast majority of road segments see the same traffic volume in both scenarios. Because the <br />Alternative 2 roadway network does not include the Red Hill Widening project, the largest difference in traffic <br />volume between the two scenarios occurs on Red Hill Avenue. Most notably, ADT on Red Hill Avenue <br />between McGaw Avenue and Sky Park decreases by 1,200 vehicles in Alternative 2 compared to the Buildout <br />Cumulative With Update scenario. The list of arterial segments that are deficient in the Alternative 2 scenario <br />are identical to those of the Buildout Cumulative With Update scenario. <br />Deficient segments under daily Alternative 2 conditions are shown in Table 3.1 and are: <br />Campus Drive: <br />o 879—Campus Drive from Carlson Avenue to University Drive (Irvine) <br />• Culver Drive: <br />0 726—Culver Drive from 1-5 NB Ramps to 1-5 SB Ramps (Irvine) <br />0 213—Culver Drive from 1-5 SB Ramps to Scottsdale Drive (Irvine) <br />0 214—Culver Drive from Scottsdale Drive to Walnut Avenue (Irvine) <br />0 215—Culver Drive from Walnut Avenue to Deerfield Avenue(Irvine) <br />0 217—Culver Drive from Irvine Center Drive to Warner Avenue (Irvine) <br />0 219—Culver Drive from Barranca Parkway to Alton Parkway (Irvine) <br />...:... <br />'.: '''•' ........ ' . <br />Iteris, Inc. 155 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.