Laserfiche WebLink
11. The City had previously engaged in significant.upzoning through its Upzoned Sites. <br /> 12.HCD recognizes the City's efforts to build significant residential capacity, and acknowledges <br /> that the City could potentially demonstrate its compliance with AB 2011 and the Housing <br /> Crisis Act of 2019 without engaging in a potentially needless and costly local legislative <br /> process. Assuming the City's site analysis of its recently Upzoned Sites is correct, the City <br /> could comply with AB 2011 by downzoning sites to an intensity of use no less than what was <br /> allowed under the land use designation or zoning ordinance in effect on January 1, 2018; <br /> revert back to its previous general plan; and re-initiate its 2022 efforts to upzone the same or <br /> similar sites as suitable AB 201.1 replacement sites. Rather than compel the City to go <br /> through that process,the City and HCD agree to conduct a substantive site analysis review to <br /> determine if the Upzoned Sites do indeed offset the losses resultant from the Ordinance's <br /> exemptions, meet environmental criteria, are suitable for residential development,and <br /> collectively affirmatively further fair housing, (See Gov. Code, §§ 65912.111,subds. (b)-(f); <br /> 65912.121, subds. (b), (e)-(h); 65912.114, subd. (i)(1)-(3); 65912.124,.subd. (i)(1)-(3); <br /> 65583.2; 66300, subd. (b)(I).)The City and HCD further agree on a process to cure any AB <br /> 2011 compliance issues should any remain after the site analysis review described herein. <br /> TERMS AND CONDITIONS <br /> Now,therefore, acknowledging and representing the truth and accuracy of the Recitals above, <br /> each and all of which are hereby incorporated into this MOU,the Parties hereby mutually agree <br /> to the following steps to assist the City in demonstrating AB 2011 compliance. <br /> 1. City Action to Substantiate Compliance with State Law.The City shall,through the <br /> schedule outlined in Section 3 below, substantiate a no net loss in residential density in the <br /> jurisdiction by way of(1)providing the total amount of lost potential density—and the <br /> resulting unit capacity—that resulted from the exemption of parcels from AB 2011 in Santa <br /> Ana Resolution No. 2023-037,Urgency Ordinance No,NS-3045, and Ordinance No.NS- <br /> 3047(Urgency Ordinance No.NS-3045 and Ordinance No.NS-3047 are collectively <br /> referred to as the"Ordinances")and the total amount of potential residential capacity created <br /> through alternative sites from its Upzoned Sites. <br /> The City shall thereafter substantiate findings in the Ordinances that the Upzoned Sites offset <br /> the loss resultant from the Ordinances' exemptions. The City will then substantiate the <br /> finding in the Ordinances that no net loss of total potential residential density in the <br /> jurisdiction has occurred. (See Gov. Code, §§ 65912.114, subd. (i)(3)(A)-(B); 65912.124, <br /> subd.(i)(3)(A)-(B).) In addition,the City must substantiate: <br /> 1.1. That the alternative sites from its Upzoned Sites meet the criteria <br /> outlined in Government Code sections 65912.111, subdivisions(b) <br /> through(f) for affordable housing developments in commercial zones, <br /> and 65912.121,subdivisions(b) and(e)through(h) for mixed-income <br /> • <br />