My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 38 - Water Revenue Bonds
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
06/04/2024
>
Item 38 - Water Revenue Bonds
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2024 4:20:09 PM
Creation date
5/29/2024 6:13:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Finance & Management Services
Item #
38
Date
6/4/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Constitutional Limit on Appropriations, Fees and Charges <br />If a portion of the Water System rates or connection charges were determined by a court to exceed the <br />reasonable costs of providing service, any fee which the City charges may be considered to be a "special tax," <br />which under Articles XIIIA or XIIID of the California Constitution must be authorized by a two-thirds vote of the <br />affected electorate. This requirement is applicable to the City's rates for service provided by the Water System. <br />The reasonable cost of service provided by the Water System has been determined by the State Controller to <br />include depreciation and allowance for the cost of capital improvements. In addition, the State courts have <br />determined that fees such as connection fees (capacity charges) will not be special taxes if they approximate the <br />reasonable cost of constructing Water System improvements contemplated by the local agency imposing the fee. <br />Such court determinations have been codified in the Government Code of the State of California (Section 66000 <br />et seq.). <br />Under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, state and local government entities have an annual <br />"appropriations limit" which limits their ability to spend certain moneys called "appropriations subject to <br />limitation," which consists of tax revenues, certain state subventions and certain other moneys, including user <br />charges to the extent they exceed the costs reasonably borne by the entity in providing the service for which it is <br />levying the charge. In general terms, the "appropriations limit" is to be based on certain Fiscal Year 1978-79 <br />expenditures, and is to be adjusted annually to reflect changes in the consumer price index, population and services <br />provided by these entities. Among other provisions of Article XIIIB, if an entity's revenues in any year exceed <br />the amount permitted to be spent, the excess would have to be returned by revising tax rates or fee schedules over <br />the subsequent two years. <br />The City is of the opinion that the rates and use charges imposed by the City in connection with the Water <br />System do not exceed the costs it reasonably bears in providing such services. <br />Limited Recourse on Default <br />If the City defaults on its obligation to make Installment Payments, the Trustee, as assignee of the <br />Authority, has the right to accelerate the total unpaid principal amounts of the Installment Payments. However, <br />in the event of a default and such acceleration there can be no assurance that the City will have sufficient Net <br />System Revenues to pay the accelerated Installment Payments. <br />No Debt Service Reserve Account <br />The Authority is not funding a debt service reserve account for the Bonds. In the event of a failure by the <br />City to pay Installment Payments when due and the Authority to timely pay debt service on the Bonds, no other <br />source of funds will be available to make such payments while the Trustee pursues available remedies under the <br />Indenture. <br />Limitations on Remedies Available; Bankruptcy <br />The enforceability of the rights and remedies of the Owners and the obligations of the City may become <br />subject to the following: the federal bankruptcy code and applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, <br />moratorium, or similar laws relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights generally, now or hereafter <br />in effect; equitable principles which may limit the specific enforcement under State law of certain remedies; the <br />exercise by the United States of America of the powers delegated to it by the Federal Constitution; and the <br />reasonable and necessary exercise, in certain exceptional situations, of the police power inherent in the sovereignty <br />of the State and its governmental bodies in the interest of servicing a significant and legitimate public purpose. <br />Bankruptcy proceedings, or the exercising of powers by the federal or State government, if initiated, could subject <br />the Owners to judicial discretion and interpretation of their rights in bankruptcy or otherwise and consequently <br />may entail risks of delay, limitation, or modification of their rights. <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.