Item 33 - Measure M2 Funding Eligibility 2024 Renewal

Home Browse Search

3.0 Pavement Network As shown in Pavernent Quality PICI Entire Network Arterial Network Local Network ....................................................... _............................... 2424 ............ d 2422 ....................................._............................................................................ 2424 2424 _.......................................1.............................................................................. 2422 2424 2424 d.............................................................................. 2422 2424 Very Good ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 861CC 42-576 46.1% 40.9% 26.7% 22.5% 26.2% 52.1% 54.5% 45.8% Good ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 75-85 19-6°% 20.9% 27.6% 163% 19.1% 23.5% 21.7% 21.9% 29.5?� Farr ........................................................;.....................................................................:.......................................;........ 60-74 20.6% 16.5% 15.4% ............ ... 33.496 .................. .............................................. 33.2% 27.0% 12.9% ............ ..... 10.5% .... ......... .... YC.7'.n ..... ........ .... ............. ..... Poor 41-59 10.2?6 11.Y% 1D.9% Y6.7% 22.9% 20.0% 6-3% 6.9% 7.1?� .......................................................... Very Poor ......................................................................;....................................._............................................................................._':.......................................;..............................................................................,.......................................'....................................... 0-40 7.1% 5.5% 5.2% 7.4% 3.3% 3.3% 7.0% 6.3% 5.97� Table 3-2, the majority of arterial streets' pavements are currently either in "Fair" (27.0 percent), "Good" (23.5 percent), or "Very Good" (26.2 percent) conditions. These results, which show a condition stabilization (no significant increase or decrease) in the top three condition categories of "Fair", "Good", and "Very Good" from 2022 to the current year (77 percent for all three categories), indicate that the City has been performing proper and timely maintenance and rehabilitation strategies for the arterial streets to maintain the percentage of streets in the top three condition categories (refer to Pavement Quality PICI Entire Network Arterial Network Local Network ............................................................................................................................................................._............................................................................_.................................................................................................................................................................... 2020 2022 2024 2020 2422 2024 2020 2022 2024 .. . ............................ Very Good 86-100 42.5% 46.Y% 4D.9% 26.7% 22.5% 26.2% 52.Y% 54.5% 45.8% ........................................................; Good ....................................................... ................................................................... 75-95 _..........................................................................................................._............................................................................_................................................................................................................................................................................................... _................... 19.6% .................... 20.8% ....................................... 27.6% ................... .................... 16.3% ....................................._........................................................................................................................................................... 18.1% 23.5% 21.7% 21.9% 29.5% Fair ........................................................o............................................................................................................................................................................................o.......................................:.....................................................................................................................o....................................... 6D-74 20.6% 16.5% 15.4% 33.0% 33.2% 27.0% 12.9% 10.5% Y0.7% Poor ..............................................................................................................................;.......................................:..............................................................................;.......................................;..............................................................................;.......................................;....................................... 41-59 10.2% 11.1% 1D.9% 16.-M 22.9% 20.0% 63% 6.9°% 7.1% Very Poor 0-40 7.1% 5.5% 5.2% 7.4% 3.3% 3.3% 7.0% 6.3% 5.9% Table 3-2 for the comparison). The sustaining in arterial street pavement conditions can be attributed to local funding and various funding sources from Orange County Transportation Authority, County of Orange, State of California, and other various agencies that the City has received in past years. Figure 3-6 shows the current PCI distribution of the arterial network. Figure 3-6: Current PCI Distribution (Arterial Network) Pa Fair, 27A Current PCI Distribution (Arterial Network) very Poor. 33% vpry r,rmwl. )6-7% . Very Goad ■ Good . Fair ■ Poor ■ Very Poor City of Santa Ana 2024 Pavement Management Program 3-7