Laserfiche WebLink
Proposal for CEQA Peer Review <br />April 2024 Page 13 <br />Task 2 Peer Review of CEQA 15183 Exemption and CEQA Project Management <br />EPD will peer review the CEQA 15183 Exemption document to ensure the requirements of CEQA, the State <br />CEQA Guidelines and City Policies related to CEQA are followed. We assume that the 15183 Exemption <br />will be provided to EPD in electronic format (Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat PDF) for peer review in <br />redline format and to view the print -ready version. <br />Specifically, our review of the document will be to confirm the pertinent sections of the CEQA Guidelines <br />governing preparation of a CEQA streamlining document (CEQA Guidelines Section 15183) are satisfied. <br />This includes an analysis of whether the 15183 Exemption adequately describes that the project would have <br />no peculiar impacts, would have no impacts that were not analyzed as significant effects in the General Plan <br />Update EIR, would have no potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts which were not discussed in <br />the General Plan Update EIR and would not result in more severe adverse impacts than the previously <br />identified significant effects discussed in the General Plan Update EIR. In addition, EPD's peer review will <br />focus on how the General Plan Update's mitigation measures and the City's development policies are <br />implemented and adhered to by the project. <br />The peer review of the 15183 Exemption will also analyze the Project Description to confirm it is complete, <br />accurate, and reflects project plans and application materials. As mentioned in Task 1, the Project Description <br />will be reviewed for consistency with the descriptions used in the supporting technical studies and the <br />Environmental Setting and existing conditions reflect the current site conditions. Finally, EPD will review the <br />document for internal consistency. <br />EPD will prepare written, clear, and concise comments in the 15183 Exemption document itself including <br />recommendations for revisions to expedite the review and revision process for the Applicant. <br />Overall, EPD will work with City Staff and the project Applicant's environmental team by conducting this <br />peer review for the purpose of establishing the credibility and strengthening the integrity of the CEQA <br />environmental documentation process by identifying any potential critical weaknesses and offering feedback <br />for improvement. EPD will coordinate the comments with the City and if authorized, with the Applicant's <br />consultant team. EPD will provide one set of comments for the first review and all comments are assumed to <br />be addressed in the second review of the reports. Additional rounds of review would require an amendment <br />to this scope of work and proposed budget. <br />Task 3. Fiscal Impact Analysis <br />EPD's subconsultant, DTA will mainly utilize a Per Capita/Employee Multiplier Approach (emphasizing <br />average expenditures and revenues) to evaluate the City General Fund revenues expected to be generated <br />by the project and costs associated with services expected to be provided by the City to the project. Under <br />this approach, DTA will thoroughly review the City's current annual budget to determine costs related to the <br />City's provision of services to its residents and all current City revenue sources. Certain project revenues, such <br />as property taxes, sales taxes, rents, and other revenues derived from the site, as well as certain project <br />costs, like park/landscape and public improvement maintenance costs, will be determined using a Case Study <br />Approach. Under the Case Study Approach, DTA will utilize specific information provided by the City or <br />project proponent, obtained from DTA's municipal cost database, gathered through internet research, and/or <br />attained from reputable data sources in order to accurately assess large-scale project revenues and costs. <br />DTA will ultimately determine the specific costs and revenues associated with the various components of the <br />project at build -out. In doing so, DTA will determine whether the project is likely to generate a net fiscal <br />surplus or net fiscal deficit for the City General Fund. <br />DTA will undertake the following tasks to analyze the Project site: <br />