My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GOVERNMENT CONSULTING PARTNERS, INC.
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
G
>
GOVERNMENT CONSULTING PARTNERS, INC.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2024 2:14:15 PM
Creation date
7/1/2024 12:17:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
GOVERNMENT CONSULTING PARTNERS, INC.
Contract #
A-2024-081
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
6/4/2024
Expiration Date
5/30/2025
Insurance Exp Date
10/1/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We can use actual time records in place of time estimates if a city employs a time-tracking system. <br /> We first review the data to determine if it is reliable enough for fee calculation purposes. We have <br /> found that time-tracked data often includes anomalous results caused by human error. If we can <br /> extract these anomalous results,this provides an excellent base for cost calculations. If the data is <br /> deemed insufficient in accordance with State guidelines, it still may be useful to spot check staff <br /> time estimates on a case-by-case basis, providing a higher comfort level for the city's decision <br /> makers. <br /> Case-study analysis method-some user fees aren't easily analyzed via the per-unit analysis method <br /> described above. For example, Santa Ana currently charges a fee of$1.75 per square foot for <br /> Sidewalk Inspections. However,your staff likely don't know how much time it takes to inspect only <br /> one square foot of newly constructed or repaired sidewalk. To overcome this, we work with your <br /> staff to identify: a)the typical project type/square footage for your city and 2)the reasonable time <br /> required to inspect a sidewalk project of this scope and size. Together,we can assess whether the <br /> current fee of$1.75 is too high or too low and the proper adjustment required to achieve full cost <br /> recovery. The results can then be extrapolated if decision-makers determine that a tiered structure <br /> is preferable due to economies of scale. <br /> Programmatic analysis method-some fee services do not lend themselves to either a per-unit or <br /> case-study method of analysis. An example includes a daily swim fee within a recreation <br /> department. Staff cannot tell us how much time they spend on one swimmer. Another example <br /> includes a general plan maintenance fee. Staff cannot quantify how their General Plan and related <br /> elements benefits specific proposed developments. For the latter fee,we calculate annual long- <br /> range program costs by amortizing staff and consultant fees associated with each element. Next <br /> we divide these total program costs by the annual fee revenue the surcharge will be applied <br /> against to calculate the appropriate surcharge amount. <br /> Share cost analysis with department contacts-Provide project status reports. <br /> 1) Incorporate new data received and email second draft results with backup calculations <br /> to each division/fee-area lead. Significant gaps between service costs and the fee <br /> currently charged are highlighted. <br /> 2) Review the second draft results with each division/fee-area lead. Incorporate in real- <br /> time any time adjustments received during the meeting. <br /> 3) Establish a firm window for any additional time revisions. <br /> Government Consulting Partners City of Santa Ana PW Proposal 16 <br /> 'MR <br /> 111^llll <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.