NS-2497 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

not result in newimpacts bey)nd the impacts previOuslY analyzed in FEIR 96-01 and would noi' ' substantiallyincrease the se,.erity of any impact to cultural rescurces identified in FE~. 96-01. Implementation of the proposed project ~vould not involve any activities that ~muld increase the risk for significant impacts to known and/or unknown cultural rescurces. Additionally, no new information has been made available since preparaticn of FEIR 96-01 that would adversely affect the cultural resource anal)sis, mitigation measures and en'fironmental determinations made in FEIR 96-01. Population/Housing/Employment Potential project related and curmlative population, housing, and employment impacts associated with the implementation of the DSC project were adequatelyevaluated in FEIR 96-01. FEIR 96-01 determined that implementation of the DSC project would not result in anysignificant population, housing, or emplo)~ent impacts and v;ould result in an actual benefit tothe community. The increased de',elopment area proposed for DSC Phase 1I would not result in new population, housing, or employment impacts bey)nd the impacts previously.analyzed in FEIR 96-01 and would not substantiallyincrease the sexerity of any population, housing, or employment impact identified in FEIR 96-01, in that the amoun[ of potential employment opportunities ganerated by the proposed project v.'ould not exceed the employment projections in FEIR 96-01. Additionally, no new information has been made available since preparatim of FEIR 96-01 that would adversely affect the analysis and environmental determinations made in FEIR 96-01. Public Services and Utilities Potential project related and cum. fiative impacts to public sen*ices and utilities asscciated with the implementation of the DSC project were adequatelyevaluated in FEIR 96-01. FEIR 96-01 determined that the DSC project would not result in significant impacts regarding the demand for natural gas, electficity, telephone service, public transit, and schc~ls. Mitigation measures were included in FEIR 96-01 to reduce potential impacts to water sera, ce and cable service to a level considered less thai! significant. FEIR 96-01, however, determined that implementation of the DSC project would not result in significant impacts. The increased dexelopment proposed for DSC Phase II would not result in new impacts to any public services or utilities bey)nd the impacts previously analyzed in FEIR 96- 01 and would not substantially increase the sexerity of any public sen'ice or utility impact identified in FEIR 96-01, in that the public semite and utility demands associated with the proposed project would not exceed the public ser',ice and utilitydemand projections established in FEIR 96-01. Additionally, no new information has been made available since preparatioa of FEIR 96-01 that would adversely affect the public senice and utilityimpact analysis, mitigation measures, and environmental detemfinations made in FEIR 96-01. Aesthetics/Light and Glare Potential project related and curmlative aesthetic impgcts and shade and shadowy impacts asscciated with the implementation of the DSC project were adequatelyevaluated in FEIR 96-01. FE[R 96-01 determined that implementation of the DSC project would not result in anysignificant aesthetic impacts. Miti~mtion measures were included in FEIR 96-01 to reduce potential glare and li~ting impacts to a level considered less than sigaificant. The projected height of the building housing the domed theater is 106 feet, v. hile the existing cube stn.~cture is 107 feet. The proposed project would not result in new aesthetic impacts or shade and shadow impacts be)x>nd the impacts previously - OrdL~ance No. NS-2497 8 Page 40 of 49 Pag~-S of 17