Laserfiche WebLink
li0 <br /> <br />In ~e <br /> <br />Protests <br /> <br />Prop~ ed <br /> <br />btreet Ooening. <br /> <br />zn Re <br /> <br />~eaolution 1162 <br />a~endlng Reeooll~8 <br />Ordering work - Porest Ave <br /> <br />In Re <br /> <br />~eolutton No. l16G <br /> <br />Ordering Reassessment <br /> <br />~nst Myrtle ~treet. <br /> <br />December Slst, 192Z, being the t'me set for the hear- <br /> <br />ing of protests or objections to the opening of Rich- <br />land Street from the West line of South Flower to the <br /> <br />E, st line of S. Shelton St. as set out in Ordinance <br /> <br />of Intention ~o. V~3 snd no quo~umbeing present at meeting <br />of December ~lst, 1~2~, end this being the next regular <br />meeting cf the Boerdcf Trustees, written protests <br />against the proposed ~pe~ing · said street were pre- <br />sented by the Clerk. Thereupon, Trustee Neff intro- <br />duced ~ resolution fixing the time for hearing ~otests <br />or objections filed with the clerk. The re~lution <br />was ordered filed, read, considered, de~gnated <br /> <br />Res lution No. 1161 and ~assed by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: Trustees <br /> <br /> Noes: Trustees <br /> Absent: Trustee <br /> <br />Trustee Chapman introduced e <br />Resolution Ordering $'~ork No. <br /> <br />~ H.Cbm~mmn, Geo. MoPhee, <br />Nat H. Neff, J. W. Tubbs. <br /> <br /> None. <br /> <br /> G. L. Killen. <br /> <br />resolution ~mending <br /> <br />1138 to read November 26th <br /> <br />1923, as date of passage instead of A~ovember lgth, <br /> <br />1923 as h~retofore shown thereon. The resolution <br /> <br />ordered filed, read, considered, design,ted Resolution <br />No. 1162 ,nd passed by the following vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes: Trustees C.H.Chapman, Geo. McPhee, <br /> Nat H. Neff, J. W.. Tubbs. <br /> <br /> Noes: ~h~ust ecs None. <br /> <br /> Absent: Trustee C.L.Killen. <br /> <br />This being the time and place where any and all persons <br />interested may show cause why the assess~t cs~erA~ <br />~he improvement of a portion of East Myrtle Street <br />as described in Besolution of Intention No. 100~, <br />should not be ~, and Wells & Breseler, being <br />interested parties in said assessment, having filed <br />a protest and petition and said protest and petition <br />having been carefully considex, ed by the Board of <br />Trustees: Trustee MePhee introduced a resolution <br />ordering a reassessment of work as set out in Resolu- <br />tion of Intention No. 1009. The resolution was order- <br />ed filed, read, considered, designated Resolution <br /> <br /> No. 116~ end passed by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: Trustees O.H.O~mpman, Oeo. McPhee <br /> Nat h. Neff, J. W. Tubbe. <br /> <br />Noes: Trustees None. <br /> <br />Absent: Trustee C.L.Killen. <br /> <br /> <br />