1928 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

284 Tn Re ReSOo No. 1965 Order~ ng Work Broadway & Riverside Dr. In Re Reso. No. 1966 Ordering Work French, Valencia and Poinsettia Sts. favor of annexation was 49, and the number of votes therein against annexation was 10, and the City Council finds that as a result of said election the proposition of annexing said territory to the City of Santa Aha was favorably voted upon. , This being the time and place set forth in Resolution Intention No. 1958 to order the work done and im made upon and along Broadway and Riverside Drive, and the City Council being duly convened in open session, proceeded to hear and pass upon all protests presented. No owner of property liable to be assessed f~r said work made written protest or any protest against the proposed work or against the extent of the dis~rict to be assessed therefor and no person appearing to protest or' object or show any cause why the improvement should not be carried out in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 1958, the City Council deemed that it had acquired Juri~dlction to order the proposed improvement. A resolution was introduced ordering the work to be done and improvement made as briefly set out in Resolution Intention No. 1958. The resolution was ordered filed, read, considered, designated Resolution Ordering Work No. 1965 and passed by the following vote: Ayes, Trustees J.L. McBride, Homer C. Chancy, Stamley E. Goode, F.L. Purinton. Trustees None. Noes, Absent, Trustees W. J. Kelly. This being the time and place set forth in Resolution Intention No. 1960 to order the work done and imt made upon and along French, Valencia and Poinsettia Streets, and the City Council being duly convened in open session, proceeded to hear and pass upon all pro- tests presented. No. o~er of property liable to be assessed for said work made written protest or any pro- test against the proposed work or against the extent of the district to be assessed therefor and no ~rson ap- pearing to protest or object or show any cause whey the improvement should not'be carried ou~ in accordance with ReBol~tion of Intention No. 1960, the City Council deemed that it had acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed improvement. A resolution was introduced ordering the~work to be done and improvement made as briefly set out in Resolution of Intention No. 1960. The resolution was ordered filed, read, considered, designated Resolution Ordering Work No. 1966 and passed by the following vote: