1928 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

302 In Re Easemen t--Ha~wood, Bishop & Grant Sts. Crossings. In Re Warrant for Native Daughters. In Re Abandoning Proceedings Ross Street between Washington & Seventeenth. In Re Asphaltic Pavement Ross bet. Washington & Seventeenth. In Re Reso. No. 198Y 0rd&ring Work Halladay Street bet. 1st & McFadden. On motion of Trustee Goode, tied, the easement frc~ the seconded by C~haney and car- Pacific Electric Railway Company, granting a permit to construct and maintain a highway upon and across Harwood, Bishop and Grant Street crossings, was accepted and the Mayor and Clerk were authorized to sign eaxement and have same recorded. On motion of Trustee Kelly, seconded by Chaney and car- ried, the Clerk was instructed to draw warrant in amount of $~5.00 from the Advertising Fund in favor of Mrs. Eunice Fox, President of the Native Daughters as a con- tribution towards expenses for Native Daughters Day at the Pacific Southwest Expostton at Long Beach. On motion of Trustee Goode, seconded by Chaney and car- ried, the City Council abandoned and declared null and void Resolution AdoPting Plans and Specifications No. 1963 and Resolution of Inte~tion No. 1977 and all pro- ceedings had thereunder, for the improven~nt of Ross Street between Washington and Seventeenth. .Ayes, Roll Call./Trustees. J.L~ McBride, W.J. Kelly, Homer C. Chaney, Stanley E. Goode, F.L. Pttrinton. Noes, Trustees, None. Absent, Trustees, None. On motion of Trustee Chaney, seconded by McBride and carried, the City Engineer was instructed to prepare plans and specifications for the paving of Ross Street between Washington and Seventeenth with asphaltlc~pave- ment, according to petition presented by the majority of property owners. This being the time and place set forth in Resolution of Intention No. 1976 to order the work done and improv~ ment made upon and along Halladay Street between First and McFadden, and the City Council being duly convened in open session, proceeded to hear and pass upon all protests presented. No owner of property liable to be assessed for said work made written protest or any pro- test against the proposed work or against the extent of the district to be assessed therefor and no person ap- pearing to protest or object or show any cause why the improvement should not be carried out in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 1976, the City Council deemed that it had acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed improve~ent~ A resolution was introduced ordering the wot k to be done and improvement made as briefly set out in Resolution of Intention No. 1976,