1928 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item: (1) (2) Griffith Co, $ .16~ $ .45.. Steele Finley .1V½ .60 In Re Peso. No. 2010 Approv. Assess. Olive· Garasey & Pine Sts. In Re Peso. No. 2011 Appr0v. Assess. Shelton, Ba~er, First & Second. distant 25 feet Easterly from the Westerly line of Mabury Street and briefly described in Resolution of Intention No..2009, and the City Council being duly con ened in open session proceeded to and did t~blicly open, examine and declare all bids received as follows: (4) (5) (6) (v) (8) .16~ .25~ .65 1~.25 14.V5 90.00 On motion of Trustee Goode, seconded by ~icBride and carried, the bids were referred to the City Manager and City Engineer for checking and to report back this meeting. Following the report, the City Council awarded, the contract to the Griffith Company as the lowest r~sponslble bidder therefor. A resolution was introduced awarding the contract. The resolution was ordered filed, read, considered, designated Resolution No. 2009 and passed by the followir~ vote: ~yes, Trustees: J.L.McBride, Homer C. Chaney, ~.J.Ke:ly, Stanley E. Goode, F.L.Purinton. Trustees: None Trustees: None NOeS ~bsent, ibis being the day and hour to which the hearing of pro- tests or appeals was continued of any person interested in the work, improvement or assessment made therefor for the improvement of portions of Olive, Garnsey and Pine Streets, in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 1921, and no person appearing to protest or object again: the assessment or any other of the proceedings taken, a Resolution overruling protests or objections to assess- men~, approving assessment and ordering the Street Superintendent to a~tach warrant and record, was ~ly introduced, read, considered, designated Resolution No. 2010 and passed by the followir~ vote: Ayes, Trustees: J.L.McBride~ ~.J.Kelly, Homer C. Chaney, Btanley~E.Go~de, F.L.P~rinton. Trustees: None Noes · Ab sent, Trustees: None .~ais being the day and hour to which the hearlug of pro- tests or appeals was continued of any person interested in the work, improvement or assessment made therefor for the improvement of porti()ns of Shelton, Baker, First and Second Streets, in accordance with l~esolution of Intent- ion No. 1935, and no person appearing to protest or object against the assessment or any other of the pro- ceedings taken, a resolution overruling protests or objections to asse-sment, approving assessment and ordering the Street Superi~ten~ent to attach warrant and