|
In Re
<br />
<br />Demands.
<br />
<br />In Re
<br />
<br />Settlement by
<br />
<br />Contractcr--S. Patton St.
<br />
<br />In Re
<br />
<br />Opening Bids on
<br />
<br />E. Fourth St. Subway
<br />
<br />Acq. & Improv. Dist. #9.
<br />
<br />In Re
<br />
<br />Reso. No. 2294
<br />
<br />Dat. Unpaid Assess.
<br />
<br />S. Patton St., etal.
<br />
<br />329
<br />
<br />On motion of Trustee Goode, seconded by Kelly and car-
<br />rieS, the Clerk was instructed to draw warrants according
<br />to demands audited by the Finance Committee.
<br />
<br />On motion of Trustee Goode, seconded by Kelly and car-
<br />ried, the Street Superintendent was instructed to hold
<br />bonds for the improvement of South Patton Street until
<br />such time as the contractor, P. P. Janich, makes a satis-
<br />factory settlement on all claims.
<br />
<br />On motion of Trustee McBride, seconded by Goode and car-
<br />ried, the City Council proceeded to open bids or proposal:
<br />for the improvement in Acquisition and Improvement Dis-
<br />t~ict No.9, known as the East Fourth Street Subway~ as
<br />
<br />follows:
<br />
<br />Robert E. McKee
<br />Western Construction Co.
<br />Drainage ConStruction Co.
<br />Martter & Bock Ltd.
<br />General Engineering Corp. Ltd.
<br />Oberg Bros.
<br />Byerts & Dunn
<br />Lynch-Cannon Engineering Co.
<br />McDonald & Ehlers
<br />Macco Construction Co.
<br />Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.
<br />Herbert M. Baruch Corp.
<br />Nead Construction Co.
<br />A. Delmatin & R.N. Nikcevich
<br />Campbell-Reichert Company.
<br />
<br />$129,000.00
<br />127,995.00
<br />112,190.00
<br />127,875.00
<br />140,000.00
<br />107,900.00
<br />142,000.00
<br />134,500.00
<br />125,230.00
<br />167,360.00
<br />131,000.00
<br />123,639.00
<br />114,850.00
<br />137,367.00
<br />136,580.00
<br />
<br /> On motion of Trustee McBride, seconded by Goode and car-
<br /> ried, all bids were referred to the Engineer for checking
<br /> to report back March 18th, 1931, at V:30 P.M.
<br />
<br />This being the time and place when and where interested
<br />persons might appear and show cause why bonds should not
<br />be issued upon the security of the unpaid assessments for
<br />work done and improvement made upon Patton, St. Andrew,s,
<br />Sycamore, Broadway, Birch and Ross Street, in accordance
<br />with Resolution of Intention No. 2218 and the City Counci~
<br />being now in session, proceeded to hear all protests pre-
<br />sented. No person appearing to protest or show any cause
<br />why bonds should not be issued a resolution was introduce~
<br />determining the unpaid assessments for work and improve-
<br />ment made upon said streets, the aggregate thereof, direc.
<br />ting bonds to be issued for the security of the unpaid
<br />assessments, prescribing the denomination of s aid bonds
<br />and providing for the issuance of same in annual series.
<br />The resolution was ordered filed, read, considered,
<br />nated Resolution No. 2294 and passed by the following vote
<br />
<br /> Ayes, Trustees J.L. McBride, W.J. Kelly, B.O. Sutton,
<br /> Stanley E. Goode, F.L. Purinton.
<br />
<br /> Noes, Trustees Nnne.
<br />
<br />Absent, Trustees None.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|