Laserfiche WebLink
I~ Re <br /> <br />Budget 1934-35. <br /> <br />In Re <br /> <br />Auditor's Report. <br /> <br />In Re <br /> <br />Ordinance No. 998 <br /> <br />Fixing Tax Rate <br /> <br />While serving on the Council, expenses have been greatly reduced. <br />For the fiscal year of 1932-3 the tax rate was $1.85 the next <br />year reduced to $1.79, and will be $1.T1 this year all in spite <br />of the reduction in an assessed valuation of 10% each year. The <br />per capita expense was $23.00 in 1929-30. It has bee constantly <br />reduced and at present is only $12.50. The entire Council worked <br />together for this economy. <br /> As Fire Commissioner, my chief responsibility has been with the <br />Fire Department. I am proud of my record. Efficiency has been <br />maintained and at the same time, expenses have been cut frmm <br />$70,840 to $53,268. By keeping the Department on a high plane, <br />fire insurance rates have been held steady and every building has <br />had the benefit. I have fought to retain the Fire Station on West <br />Third Street. Had I lost, hundreds of homes would have been put <br />in unnecessary jeopardy. <br /> The charge that I have supported donations to private organiza- <br />tions is absolutely untPue. The Advertising and Music ~ind was <br />voted by the people and are governmental functions. The National <br />Guard is a State Military Unit, controlled by the Governor. How <br />can these be termed private organizations? <br /> The proponents of the recall and associates, promulgated the idea <br />that I am controlled by politicians. This charge is purely politi- <br />cal and untrue. It is a charge made by anyone who is reckless in <br />language and reckless of the reputation of others. <br /> It seems extremely unfair and ridiculous to condemn a Councilman <br />because he has a job. Should every Councilman be independently <br />rich, retired and idle? At the tim~ I was appointed to the Board, <br />I was and still am employed by the County Welfare Department. My <br />duties are of a nature that have saved the taxpayers thousands of <br />dollars. It has also made it possible for me to bring to the Coun- <br />cil valuable information and cooperation relief needs. Thus, the <br />situation has been aided - not harmed. <br /> I do not believe I should be criticized for earning a living <br />serving as a member of the City Council. <br /> Any effort to recall me is most certainly an abuse of the recall. <br />It has been found it will cost $5,000, if carried on, a large <br />of which goes to those who find elections extremely profitable. <br /> If the recall is successful, the change cannot ~ake place until <br />January. The General City Election is in April. Three Months <br />$5,000~ Who is the Reckless Spender? <br /> <br />(Signed) V~. H. Penn. <br /> <br />On motion of Trustee Bruns, seconded by Rowland and carried, the abc <br /> <br />answers of E. G. Warner and W m, H. Penn to the charges preferred by <br /> <br />the "Tax Pa~ers League" on which is based their grounds for a Recall <br /> <br />were read, received and.filed. <br /> <br />On motion of Trustee Bruns, seconded by Rowland and carried, the <br />budget as prepared and submitted by the City Auditor for the 1934- <br />35 was approved and filed. <br /> <br />On motion of Trustee Rowland, secmaded by Penn and carried, the <br />report of Crenshaw, Diehl and Wright, public accountants, for the <br />fiscal yesr June 30th, 1934, covering accounts of the City of Santa <br />Aha, was received and filed. <br /> <br />An Ordinance entitled: <br /> <br /> "An Ordinance of the City of Santa Ana, California, fixing the <br />amount of money ascertained to carry on the various departments of <br />the Cit~ of Santa Ana, and to pay the bonded indebtedness falling <br />due for the current year 1934-35, and fixing the rate of taxation <br />for the current year 1934-35, designating the number of cents on <br />each $100.00 for the various funds of said City on the whole of the <br />taxable property of said City as set by the Count~ Assessor of the <br />County of Orange, State of California, and equalized by the Board <br />of Supervisors of said County, and hereby levied on the whole of <br />the taxable property of said City." <br /> <br />was finally read, considered, designated Ordinance No. 998 and <br /> <br />passed by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes, Trustees A. F. LeGaye, Fred C. Rowland, W. H. Penn, <br /> Plummet W. Bruns, E. G. Warner. <br /> <br />Noes, Trustees None. <br /> <br />Absent, Trustees None. <br /> <br /> <br />