Laserfiche WebLink
etc.), response functionality, standard Library <br />Comments. <br />• Reviewing prior comments to check if they've <br />been resolved. <br />• Resolving prior comments through the Review <br />Comments page. <br />• Using the Compare Files tool to compare <br />resubmittals with prior submittals. <br />Completing plan check reviews in the E-form <br />window by changing Review Status to "Approved" <br />or "Corrections Required" and filling out the <br />Timesheet Log. <br />Already having experience with navigating and <br />utilizing ProjectDox allows our plan check team to "hit <br />the ground running" on performing plan check reviews <br />with zero learning curve. Figure 2 below is a sample <br />of our on-line/electronic plan check comments. <br />Record Keeping and Reporting <br />Through years of experience, we have developed <br />streamlined procedures that produce timely, <br />accurate, and consistent plan reviews. Submitted <br />improvement plans will be logged into a plan check <br />log. The plan check log (see Figure 1 on page 7) <br />tracks the engineer of record, types of improvement <br />plans submitted, date submitted, due date to be <br />completed, and any significant comments or submittal <br />requirements outstanding for that plan review. Cannon <br />will provide regular updates (and as requested by the <br />City) of the status of plan reviews to report progress <br />and anticipated return dates of outstanding plan check <br />projects. <br />As part of our project controls, Cannon will keep a <br />record of when plans are received and returned in <br />our plan check log. Excellent communications will <br />allow us to define questionable areas, technical <br />requirements, and to facilitate a smooth review and <br />approval process. <br />Turnaround Time <br />We take no exception to the turnaround time as <br />outlined in the City's RFP. If expedited reviews are <br />requested, we are open to having discussions with the <br />City and implementing these types of reviews. <br />Figure 2. Sample of On-line/Electronic Plan Check Comments <br />-■ <br />M Poec4ve GWhV PW PW V1 <br />4 <br />A <br />A <br />t. <br />MnWle. PeNev- Wn—• "M <br />...UMON NVI' <br />Rh•1'1NA'1%"QUANTITI�, —_— __ � �— <br />�dL��B— yr3 1 i 1 <br />� I <br />.AIW.� <br />I Err <br />