Laserfiche WebLink
Quality Assurance / Quality Control <br />Program <br />Cannon has earned a strong reputation for product <br />delivery and professional service. We have built and <br />continue to develop internal control processes that <br />incorporate peer review and progress reporting to <br />help projects meet established design and review <br />guidelines, remain within budget, and stay on <br />schedule. We take a proactive approach to project <br />management, with an emphasis on project and review <br />process familiarity, open communication, quality <br />and cost control, and project scheduling. Processes <br />include a Work Product Review (WPR) Program, <br />project "Look Backs,' Project Progress Reviews, plan <br />check checklists, and an Earned Value Analysis (EVA) <br />program. <br />In addition, we employ cost savings strategies that <br />have been effective in managing projects for public <br />and private industry clients. These strategies may <br />include: cost benefit analysis and value engineering <br />reviews; alternative technologies review or innovative <br />approach analysis; and the use of plan check review <br />control logs. <br />Our work -flow incorporates quality review processes <br />to confirm compliance with standards, and that our <br />engineering services are accurate, efficient, and fully <br />Workflow Chart <br />meet our clients' expectations. We place an emphasis <br />on "getting it right the first time." <br />Deliverables <br />We recognize the importance of providing accurate, <br />detailed, and high -quality deliverables. It is critical that <br />plan check redlines and the comment letter clearly <br />illustrate the necessary information to produce a <br />successful project. Many of our Cannon design staff <br />have also worked in our Construction Management <br />Department, gaining meaningful insight on the <br />importance of well-defined plans, specifications, and <br />bid item quantities. Our Project "Look Backs" are <br />not only conducted from the designer perspective, <br />but also from our managers perspective, to further <br />develop our design team's accuracy in work products. <br />We have illustrated our plan check work -flow process <br />below. <br />Schedule <br />We will comply with the guidelines stated in <br />Attachment t of the RFP, confirming the initial plan <br />review will be completed within a maximum of four <br />weeks, followed by a two -week period for the second <br />review, and a one -week turnaround time for further <br />reviews, if necessary. <br />Alk If no further comment <br />X 4104 <br />LAssigns <br />recommentlfor permitapprovalna Cannon Logs Cannon Plan WPR process is _ City issues <br />ct in Systems Checker Review completed approved grading <br />permit <br />