Laserfiche WebLink
Within ICF's PowerGuide, we can also specifically limit the selection of EV models to those available on cooperative <br />purchasing contracts, such as Sourcewell, Drive EV Fleets, California Department of General Services, and others. <br />Our EV library has already embedded the information regarding most of these cooperative purchasing contracts. This <br />approach is designed to streamline the future vehicle procurement process for the City. Additionally, we will include <br />recommendations on the types of cooperative purchasing contracts that may be most suitable for the City to ensure <br />that City staff can make informed decisions that align with their specific needs and procurement strategies. <br />Environmental Impacts: In addition to the TCO, the ICF team will conduct a lifecycle assessment accounting for <br />emissions from electricity as well as liquid fuel production and distribution. ICF's PowerGuide can evaluate the <br />criteria pollutant and GHG emissions reduction potential from the City's electric fleet. Our approach is based on <br />lifecycle GHG emission factors from Argonne National Laboratory's Alternative Fuel Life -Cycle Environmental and <br />Economic Transportation (AFLEET) tool and data from EPA's Emissions and Generation Resource Integrated <br />Database (eGRID) to account for electricity carbon intensity variation at the regional level. <br />PowerGuide Deliverables: Using the PowerGuide, the ICF team will deliver key recommendations at a vehicle -by - <br />vehicle level and a fleet level. Outputs of the model will include the following: <br />• Recommended zero emission technologies (battery electric, plug-in hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles) <br />• Recommended EV replacement makes and models <br />• TCO, including the upfront and lifecycle vehicle costs <br />• Identification of vehicle types that are least viable for conversion <br />• Recommended replacement years <br />• A fleetwide phased vehicle replacement schedule <br />• Estimated GHG emissions reductions from EV replacements <br />• Recommended charger types (e.g., Level 2, DCFC) <br />Task 3.2 Electric Vehicle Charging Equipment Needs Assessment <br />Charging Infrastructure Assessment: Using the fleet <br />modeling results and recommendations developed in F I e e t C H A R G E <br />Task 3.1, we will identify sites that will require new or \1/ <br />upgraded charging infrastructure, including the number, Charged by - <br />types, and power level of EVSE. This assessment will be <br />conducted using our FIeetCHARGE tool, which is specifically designed to evaluate the charging energy and power <br />requirements at each site where EV replacements are recommended and where EV operation is concentrated. The <br />algorithms embedded in the tool analyze expected vehicle operations at each site and compare them with critical <br />information on the EVs to accurately estimate daily charging needs. Key factors considered include the vehicles' <br />energy efficiency, daily mileage or operation hours, battery capacity, maximum power acceptance rates, and <br />charging time. <br />we will utilize information on vehicle dwell time, driving routes, parking locations, and operational characteristics to <br />determine the optimal locations for charging infrastructure. Using this information, the ICF team will develop a <br />charging infrastructure implementation scenario with rollout schedule that projects the following information: <br />• The projected number of chargers needed at each site to support the EV replacements <br />• The recommended locations of EV charging infrastructure <br />• The recommended type (e.g., Level 1, Level 2, DCFC) and power level (in kW) of chargers for each vehicle type <br />• The overall power need associated with charging infrastructure at each site <br />Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal <br />