Laserfiche WebLink
Charging Infrastructure Optimization: One of the key features that sets <br />ICF's FleetCHARGE tool apart from other charging infrastructure models in <br />the market is its embedded optimization algorithms. These algorithms <br />enable the City to optimize the number of chargers by increasing the vehicle - <br />to -plug (V2P) ratio while maintaining the resilience of both charging and fleet <br />operations. Following the development of the baseline charging <br />infrastructure needs scenario (assuming 1:1 V2P), FleetCHARGE uses its <br />optimization algorithm to develop an optimized charging infrastructure needs <br />scenario. This involves determining the most appropriate V2P ratio for each <br />groups of vehicles and assessing the feasibility of smarUscheduled charging. <br />This approach implies using fewer charging stations to service a greater <br />number of EVs, leading to significant cost savings. It reduces the upfront <br />investment in charging infrastructure and minimizes ongoing operational and <br />maintenance expenses. Moreover, this efficient use of resources is <br />particularly beneficial in conserving space, a crucial aspect in urban or <br />densely populated areas. The ICF team will carefully review the <br />recommendations provided by its FleetCHARGE tool to identify the highest <br />feasible V2P ratios that can be achieved while ensuring reliability and <br />successful daily operations of the fleet <br />oro ® ofo <br />In this scenario, each vehicle is paired <br />with a dedicated charging plug, ensuring <br />that every vehicle has its designated <br />charging part. <br />ofo ofo <br />0 <br />o/o ! ofo <br />ofo ofo <br />• Optimized V2P ratio <br />• Multiple vehicles share a port <br />- This scenario aims to optimize the number <br />In determining the charging infrastructure needed for each location, the ICF <br />of vehicles capable ofsharing a charging <br />team will also plan for future growth and expansion by considering the <br />port. This is accomplished by adjusting the <br />scalabilit of the chosen charging station configurations. Our team will <br />y g g g <br />vehicle -to -plug ratioensure efficient use <br />- or infrastructure while still meeting each <br />anticipate the potential increase in the City's EV fleet and ensure the <br />vehicle's duty cycle, <br />selected charging stations can accommodate the additional demand. This may involve allocating additional space and electrical capacity for future installations. By proactively considering <br />scalability, the ICF team will ensure the charging infrastructure can easily adapt and scale up to meet the growing <br />needs of the City's EV fleet. <br />Similar to the approach taken in fleet transition planning, the ICF team will also extend its services to provide <br />recommendations for cooperative contract procurement options for charging infrastructure, if available. This includes <br />exploring established contracts with entities such as Sourcewell and Drive EV Fleets, among others, to ensure the <br />City has access to the most efficient and cost-effective charging solutions. <br />Opportunity for Community -Level and Employee Charging: In addition to fleet charging, the ICF team will also <br />evaluate the feasibility of installing publicly accessible community -level charging infrastructure at various facilities <br />(including cities' public parking facilities), an initiative aimed at enhancing EV adoption within communities and for <br />City employees. This process involves a collaborative effort with facility managers to assess the frequency of public <br />vehicle visits and the average dwelling time of these vehicles at the facilities. This information is critical in determining <br />both the number of charging stations required and the appropriate power level for each charger. For instance, in <br />scenarios where vehicles are typically parked for more than 2 hours, such as at parks or libraries, Level 2 chargers <br />would be suitable. These chargers offer a balance between speed and efficiency, making them ideal for longer stays. <br />Moreover, the volume of visiting vehicles and the likelihood of these being EVs will inform the decision on the number <br />of charging stations needed at each facility. However, the mere presence of charging stations may attract additional <br />EV users to these facilities. Therefore, a safety factor will be applied to account for this potential increase in EV <br />traffic. To prioritize City facilities for public and employee charging, the ICF team will develop a scoring rubric to <br />identify the most suitable facilities for charger installation. Through this scoring as well as the assessment described <br />earlier, the ICF team will provide recommendations on the number and type of publicly accessible chargers that <br />eligible facility could consider. <br />Utility -side Electrical Infrastrcture Assessment: Once the team has determined the number, types, output power <br />levels, and locations of chargers (including both fleet and community charging) to be deployed, we will review the <br />capacity of the City's facilities to support the projected additional electrical load from charging EVs and identify <br />if% <br />