Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF SANTA ANA <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />X. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA <br />A. Evaluation: The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will <br />evaluate proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined <br />directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. <br /> <br /> <br />B. Scoring Criteria: Proposers will be ranked by the review committee based on the following <br />criteria: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />C. Rankings: A final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank <br />Proposers. Based upon the foregoing criteria, all proposals shall be ranked by score. Only <br />those proposals receiving a score above 70 will be considered for award. The City reserves <br />the right to award the contract to any proposer(s) with a score above 70. The review <br />committee will evaluate proposers based on their response to the RFP and the City <br />evaluation criteria set forth above. <br /> <br />D. Selection: The City is under no obligation to accept any proposal and reserves the right to <br />negotiate with respondents as to fees and terms. The City may reject proposals at its sole <br />discretion. If proposal fails to satisfy any requirements outlined in this RFP, it may be <br />considered non-responsive and may be rejected. <br /> <br />The City shall not be obligated to accept the lowest priced proposals, but will make awards <br />in the best interests of the City after all factors have been evaluated. The review committee <br />will recommend the qualified Proposers to the City Council or City Manager for award of <br />contract, as appropriate. <br /> <br />CATEGORY POINTS <br />Responsiveness to RFP <br /> Proposal’s compliance with the requirements of this RFP. <br /> Scope of Services offered including ability to provide optional services. <br /> The value to any new and/or innovative product or service suggestions or <br />other new ideas and enhancements. <br /> <br />20 <br />Understanding of Need <br /> Include milestones of completion of key tasks, to be completed by specific <br />team members. <br />35 <br />Relevant Project Experience/Schedule of Delivery <br /> Relevant project experience within the last 5 years, including experience <br />with public agencies. <br /> The experience, resources, and qualifications of the firm and individuals <br />assigned to this account, including manager, supervisor and assigned <br />staff. <br />40 <br />References <br /> References that are similar in size and project scope to the City. <br /> <br />5 <br />TOTAL POSSIBLE SCORE 100 <br />  <br />  <br />City Council 14 – 15 9/17/2024