Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDFNDUM <br />Bristol Street Widening Phase ILIA — Civio Center Drive to Washington Avenue <br />This Addendum to the previously certified 1990 FEIS/EIR has been prepared because Project -related <br />modifications to the Bristol Street alignment do not trigger the need for further environmental analysis in <br />a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under the requirements CEQA (refer to CEQA Guidelines Sections <br />15162 and 15163, respectively). <br />1.1 Purpose of an Addendum <br />Under CEQA, when an EIR has been certified for a project, no Subsequent EIR may be required for that <br />project unless the lead agency determines, based upon substantial evidence, that one or more specified <br />circumstances has occurred. Only if one or more of the following circumstances arises is a Subsequent <br />EIR required, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162: <br />I. (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major <br />revision of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br />environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously <br />identified significant effects; <br />2. (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the <br />project is undertaken which will require major revision of the previous EIR due <br />to the involvement of new significant environmental increase in the severity of <br />previously identified significant effects; or <br />3. (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could <br />not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the <br />previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: <br />(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the <br />previous EIR; <br />(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe <br />than shown in the previous EIR; <br />(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible <br />would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more <br />significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to <br />adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or <br />(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from <br />those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more <br />significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline <br />to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. (CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15162[a]) <br />A Supplement to an EIR (or Supplemental EIR), which is narrower in scope than a Subsequent EIR, may <br />be prepared if any of the above criteria apply, but "[o]nly minor changes or additions would be necessary <br />to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation" (CEQA Guidelines <br />Section 15163[a][2]). In the absence of the need to prepare either a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR, an <br />Addendum may be prepared. More specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states: <br />(a) The lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously <br />certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions <br />described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have <br />occurred. <br />(b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor <br />technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in <br />Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative <br />declaration have occurred. <br />ANA 305-011 (PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/19/2015) YU PACE 2 <br />