My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
09/17/2024
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2024 1:25:15 PM
Creation date
9/11/2024 12:05:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
9/17/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Flores, Dora <br />From:Dee Fox <dee.fox@me.com> <br />Sent:Monday, September 9, 2024 6:30 PM <br />To:Fred Jung <br />Subject:OCPA EMAIL RESPONSE <br />Attachments:OCPARegister010123to033124.pdf <br /> Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br /> <br />While I appreciate you responding to my email, I wish you would have addressed my concerns. Instead you <br />basically said I should be fortunate to get these check registers now because the prior council did not provide <br />them. And you neglected to “blame” yourself too, as you were also part of that prior council. <br /> <br />You also stated that the OCPA “regularly” publishes the expense register. No, they/you don’t. And the evidence <br />on your website proves that it is posted every quarter in your Treasury Reports. Let me ask you a dumb <br />question. How is the public suppose to voice their concerns about the board expenditures when they are not <br />posted until 3 months AFTER the fact? Where is the transparency, Fred? You don’t even list these expenditures <br />on the agendas. <br /> <br />So, back to my concern. How do you justify these expenditures where the majority come from YOU, TAMMY <br />KIM, and KATHLEEN TRESEDER? How are they benefitting the ratepayers of the OCPA in providing <br />renewable energy? $5,000 for Tommy Lasorda Day in Fullerton, and $2,500 of ratepayer funds going <br />specifically to support Korean businesses overseas, as just 2 examples. Airfare, hotels, one for over $14,000, <br />lots of dinners, expensive dinners…are the ratepayers paying for alcohol at these events? Fred, there is no <br />transparency with this organization, and frankly, it is worse off than it was when it started. You still have the <br />same legal agency, and the same consultants, which Treseder promised to replace or she would vote to get out <br />of the OCPA, but the temptation must have been too much for her. She had to give $30,000 to Ayn Cracuin’s <br />campaign for city council. This is abuse of public funds, Fred, in case you didn’t know. <br /> <br />Also, why is the 2nd quarter Treasury Report not posted on the OCPA website? The quarter ended in June in <br />case you were not aware. And why didn’t you address my concern about your promise to put public emails <br />regarding the agenda attached to the minutes? <br />This agency is being funded by the ratepayers and it demands transparency in spending, and not after the fact! <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />———— <br />Dee Fox <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />On Sep 2, 2024, at 1:28 PM, Fred Jung <Fred.Jung@cityoffullerton.com> wrote: <br /> <br />Dear Ms. Dee Fox, <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.