Laserfiche WebLink
Citywide Translation and Interpretation Services <br />October 1, 2024 <br />Page 2 <br />Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 24-022A was issued on February 22, 2024 on the <br />City's online bid management and publication system. A summary of vendor <br />participation and results is as follows: <br />185 Vendors notified <br />16 Santa Ana vendors notified <br />59 Vendors downloaded the RFP packet <br />16 Proposals received <br />0 Proposals received from Santa Ana vendors <br />Proposals were solicited, opened on March 21, 2024, and evaluated. Sixteen proposals <br />were submitted by the RFP deadline and 15 proposals were determined to be <br />responsive to the specifications and met the City's requirements. The proposal <br />submitted by Multilingual Technologies, Inc. was deemed non -responsive as they did <br />not submit all required documents by the RFP, and did not meet RFP specifications. An <br />evaluation committee reviewed and rated the proposals according to the criteria listed in <br />the RFP, and the following summarizes the responding firms and their rankings: <br />Firm <br />Location <br />Rank <br />Interpreters Unlimited, Inc. <br />San Diego, CA <br />1 <br />Continental Interpreting Services, Inc. <br />Brea, CA <br />2 <br />Cesar Vargas and Associates <br />Orange CA <br />3 <br />Accent on Languages, Inc. <br />Berkeley, CA <br />4 <br />Effectiff, LLC <br />Fort Lauderdale, FL <br />5 <br />Homeland Language Services <br />Oxnard, CA <br />6 <br />Pro io LS, LLC <br />Overland Park, KS <br />7 <br />Language Line Services, Inc. <br />Monterrey, CA <br />8 <br />Global Language Solutions, LLC <br />Philadelphia, PA <br />9 <br />911 Interpreters, Inc. <br />Chicago, IL <br />10 <br />PLGS, LLC <br />Arlington, VA <br />11 <br />Flix Translations Group, LLC <br />Miami, FL <br />12 <br />Officemotive <br />Williston, SC <br />13 <br />The Translation House <br />Sun Valley, CA <br />14 <br />Universal Technical Translation <br />Houston, TX <br />15 <br />In accordance with the RFP criteria, Staff evaluated proposals and determined that <br />Interpreters Unlimited, Inc., Continental Interpreting Services, Inc., Mente, Inc. dba <br />Cesar Vargas and Associates, and Accent on Languages, Inc. best met the City's <br />specifications, demonstrated vast experience working with public agencies, and the <br />capacity to provide translation and interpretation services on -site and remotely to <br />various City Departments. Therefore, staff recommends awarding agreements with <br />Interpreters Unlimited, Inc. (Exhibit 1), Continental Interpreting Services, Inc. (Exhibit 2), <br />Cesar Vargas and Associates (Exhibit 3), and Accent on Languages, Inc. (Exhibit 4) to <br />ensure sufficient resources are available for all using departments. <br />