My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/01/2024
>
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2024 12:33:51 PM
Creation date
9/25/2024 8:40:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
26
Date
10/1/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Related Bristol Specific Plan Entitlements & Development Agreement (3600 S. Bristol St.) <br />and Staff Resolution Modifying Parking Districts in the Surrounding Area <br />October 1, 2024 <br />Page 4 <br />of 37 individuals spoke on the item, including three individuals representing the <br />applicant and two representing onsite land ownership. Comments ranged from those in <br />support, those without a clear position, and those opposed. The nature of the comments <br />in support focused on opportunities to develop the site with a new, mixed -use village <br />that would generate positive impacts for the City and surrounding communities, while <br />those with no clear position or in opposition focused on concerns surrounding traffic, <br />increases in rent, and the lack of project labor agreements. <br />Following public comments, the public hearing was closed and the item returned to the <br />City Council for discussion. City Council members posed nine (9) questions about the <br />project for follow-up by the applicant and staff, after which the City Council unanimously <br />voted to continue the matter to the regularly scheduled meeting of October 1, 2024. <br />Exhibit 21 outlines the City Council questions to the applicant and their responses. <br />Exhibit 22 outlines the City Council questions for staff and contains staff responses. <br />Planning Commission Hearing on August 12, 2024 <br />The Planning Commission considered the project on August 12, 2024, and unanimously <br />voted to recommend that the City Council approve the requested entitlements and <br />development agreement. As part of its motion, the Planning Commission expressed a <br />desire for two additional considerations, detailed below: <br />1. Describe apDlicability of inclusionary housina reauirements to the senior <br />continuum of care units. The motion by the Planning Commission includes a <br />provision for the City Council staff report to further the applicability of <br />inclusionary housing requirements to the senior continuum of care units. <br />Pursuant to the Affordable Housing Creation and Opportunity Ordinance <br />(AHOCO)/Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Sections 41-1903(a) and 41- <br />1904, the draft development agreement (DA) provides for the applicant to pay <br />an in -lieu fee of $5 per square foot of habitable residential area, contingent on <br />timely payment of the $22 million community benefit payment required by the <br />DA. <br />The project proposes up to 200 senior continuum of care units, which are not <br />residential units and are instead considered commercial. The facility will offer <br />long-term living accommodations for seniors, offering a range of supportive <br />services that render the land use commercial, not residential. Should the <br />applicant wish to convert these senior continuum of care units to residential <br />units, regardless of age registration, the AHOCO would apply. These units <br />would therefore be subject to the inclusionary housing requirements of the DA <br />because they would then be considered residential and would not be exempt <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.