My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/01/2024
>
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2024 12:33:51 PM
Creation date
9/25/2024 8:40:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
26
Date
10/1/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Related Bristol Specific Plan Entitlements & Development Agreement (3600 S. Bristol St.) <br />and Staff Resolution Modifying Parking Districts in the Surrounding Area <br />October 1, 2024 <br />Page 5 <br />from being required to pay the $5 per square foot of habitable residential area <br />in -lieu fee. <br />2. Create a community benefit payment citizen oversight committee. The DA <br />requires a $22 million community benefit payment that will be spent at the <br />direction of the City Council. The motion by the Planning Commission <br />includes a provision for the City Council to appoint a resident oversight <br />committee to advise the City Council how these funds should be spent. This <br />oversight committee would not apply to the estimated $18 million in affordable <br />housing in -lieu fees that are expected to be paid as part of development of <br />the project. <br />Prior to the August 12, 2024 3:30 p.m. electronic comments submission deadline, the <br />City received 25 public comments on the project that were submitted online. The <br />majority of the comments were in opposition and focused on concerns such as density, <br />open space, traffic, and parking. The City prepared written responses for each <br />comment; the responses were uploaded to the record and printed for the public hearing <br />prior to the 5:30 p.m. meeting. Those responses are attached to this report as Exhibit <br />14. <br />During the public hearing, a total of 29 individuals provided comments on the project. Of <br />the 29 comments, 18 were in support, one (1) was in opposition, and 10 expressed no <br />clear position. The nature of the comments in support centered on the project's <br />proposed improvements and contributions to the community, while those in opposition <br />or with no clearly stated position centered on concerns about density, open space, <br />traffic, parking, and oversight of how the DA's $22 million community benefit payment <br />would be spent. <br />Additional Clarifications and Refinements <br />Subsequent to the August 12t" Planning Commission hearing, the Applicant requested <br />two refinements to the Development Agreement that further clarify certain issues within <br />the Development Agreement. <br />The first refinement is responsive to the Commission's provision regarding the <br />applicability of the inclusionary housing requirements to the senior continuum of care <br />component of the Development Agreement. The Agreement has been refined to clearly <br />state that the inclusionary housing ordinance does not exempt age -restricted or senior <br />residential housing from meeting affordability requirements and should the applicant <br />wish to convert the senior continuum of care units to residential units, these units would <br />be subject to the inclusionary housing requirements under the Agreement and would be <br />required to pay the $5 per square foot of habitable residential area in -lieu fee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.