My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/15/2024
>
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 5:25:09 PM
Creation date
10/3/2024 10:57:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
10/15/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Flores, Dora <br />From: mike@tardifsheetmetal.com <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2024 12:16 PM <br />To: eComment <br />Cc: Bob Adams <br />Subject: For Public Comments - How a state 'justice' law created injustice in Santa Ana <br />Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />Please distribute this email, and print, as Public Comment to Mayor and City Council members. <br />How a state `justice' law created injustice in Santa <br />Ana <br />By STEVEN GREENHUT I Orange County Register <br />PUBLISHED: October 13, 2024 at 5:07 p.m. <br />SACRAMENTO — Nearly 17 years ago, I penned a feature column for The Orange County Register about <br />Santa Ana's "Renaissance Plan," which was a city idea to drive out 130-plus commercial and industrial <br />businesses and replace them with a high-rise transit -oriented district featuring condos and apartments. The <br />plan also called for revamping downtown. I'm all for high rises, housing construction and downtown <br />improvements — but not in a manner that obliterates people's property rights in the process. As I wrote, "I'd <br />call it the `Forced Gentrification Plan' or `Send Good -Paying Industrial Jobs to Rialto Plan,' or as one person <br />said sardonically, `Remove the Poor Mexicans from Downtown Santa Ana Plan."' I encouraged the public to <br />express outrage. After a fracas ensued, and state Sen. (now congressman) Lou Correa intervened, Santa Ana <br />officials compromised with an "overlay zone" that allowed these businesses to continue operating, even as <br />developers built housing projects around them. A fair solution, it echoed neighboring Anaheim's up -zoning <br />of the light -industrial Platinum Triangle. I hate this term, but this was a "win -win." <br />Time goes on and now Santa Ana is governed by officials who embrace the latest planning trends. The city <br />unveiled its Renaissance Plan at the beginning of a subprime-mortgage crisis and bursting housing bubble. <br />Since then, housing prices have soared and the entire state is struggling with housing shortages. Hence, <br />lawmakers passed myriad laws encouraging and subsidizing multi -family housing construction. The state has <br />also pressured cities (including Santa Ana) that fall short of state -mandated housing goals. <br />Meanwhile in 2017, then -Gov. Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 1000, which promotes "environmental justice" <br />by, as the attorney general's office explains, "requiring local governments to identify environmental justice <br />communities ... in their jurisdictions and address environmental justice in their general plans." Basically, <br />cities must mitigate pollution in poorer neighborhoods. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.