My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/15/2024
>
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 5:25:09 PM
Creation date
10/3/2024 10:57:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
10/15/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ob Adams, president of Adams <br />Iron, Inc. in Santa Ana. <br />Now Santa Ana is back with a plan that echoes the Renaissance Plan. The rationales have changed, but the <br />policies remain the same. With little outreach to business owners, City Council this year approved a <br />moratorium on the approval, expansion or modification of any industrial uses in the SD-84 Transit Zone. And <br />the city is working to permanently rezone the area. <br />I've talked to business owners in the area, who have had minor ministerial permits and business changes <br />rejected by city officials because of the moratorium. Even if the city lets them operate for the foreseeable <br />future, a permanent zone change will destroy the improved value of the land. (By the way, residents in the <br />"protected" Logan and Lacy neighborhoods fear the moratorium will drive up rental prices.) These businesses <br />invested heavily in the properties since 2007, including construction of new buildings. If they can't sell <br />for ongoing industrial uses, any sale price will be reduced to the price of raw land. According to owners I <br />interviewed, this means drops in value of 25 percent to 75 percent. And the city is making it tough for them to <br />keep operating as is. In an August letter, an attorney for Adams Iron Co. argued the city is holding up permit <br />approvals even though the ordinance "does not authorize the city to put on hold permits for existing industrial <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.