My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 37 - Discuss and Consider Prepare an Ordinance Prohibiting Contracts with City Officials and their Immediate Family Members
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Item 37 - Discuss and Consider Prepare an Ordinance Prohibiting Contracts with City Officials and their Immediate Family Members
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 2:34:51 PM
Creation date
11/13/2024 10:30:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Item #
37
Date
11/19/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEC. 4.105. COMPLAINTS OF IMPROPER GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY; INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES; REFERRAL TO <br />OTHER AGENCIES. <br />(a) COMPLAINTS. Any person may file a complaint with the Ethics Commission, Controller, District Attorney or City Attorney, or a <br />written complaint with the complainant's department alleging that a City officer or employee has engaged in improper government <br />activity by: violating local campaign finance, lobbying, conflicts of interest or governmental ethics laws, regulations or rules; violating <br />the California Penal Code by misusing City resources; creating a specified and substantial danger to public health or safety by <br />failing to perform duties required by the officer or employee's City position; or abusing his or her City position to advance a private <br />interest. <br />(b) ETHICS COMMISSION COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. The Ethics Commission shall investigate complaints filed under this <br />Section that allege violations of local campaign finance lobbying, conflicts of interest and governmental ethics laws pursuant to the <br />procedures specified in Charter Section C3.699-13 and the regulations adopted thereunder. Nothing in this subsection shall <br />preclude the Ethics Commission from referring any matter to any other City department, commission, board, officer or employee or <br />to other government agencies for investigation and possible disciplinary or enforcement action. The Ethics Commission may require <br />that any City department, commission, board, officer or employee report to the Ethics Commission on the referred matter. <br />(c) REFERRAL. The Ethics Commission shall refer complaints that do not allege a violation of law, regulation or rule that is within <br />the Ethics Commission's jurisdiction to the appropriate agency for investigation and possible disciplinary or enforcement action. The <br />Commission may conduct preliminary investigations into such complaints to determine whether the complaint contains sufficient <br />information to warrant referral. The Ethics Commission may require that any City department, commission, board, officer or <br />employee report to the Ethics Commission on the referred matter. (Added by Ord. 71-00, File No. 000358, App. 4/28/2000; <br />amended by Ord. 29-02, File No. 020017, App. 3/15/2002) <br />SEC. 4.110. DEFINITIONS. <br />For purposes of this Chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: <br />(a) The term "City" means the City and County of San Francisco, its departments, commissions and boards. <br />(b) The term "complainant's department" includes the complainant's supervisor, the executive director or highest ranking officer in <br />the complainant's department, and the board or commission overseeing the complainant's department. <br />(c) The term "preliminary investigation" shall be limited to, but need not include: review of the complaint and any documentary <br />evidence provided with the complaint; interview of the complainant; interview of the respondent, counsel to respondent and any <br />witnesses who voluntarily agree to be interviewed for this purpose; review of any relevant public documents and documents <br />provided voluntarily to the Commission. (Added by Ord. 71-00, File No. 000358, App. 4/28/2000; amended by Ord. 29-02, File No. <br />020017, App.3/15/2002) <br />SEC. 4.115.PROTECTION OF WHISTLEBLOWERS. <br />(a) RETALIATION PROHIBITED. No City officer or employee may terminate, demote, suspend or take other similar adverse <br />employment action against any City officer or employee because the officer or employee has in good faith filed a complaint with the <br />Ethics Commission, Controller, District Attorney or City Attorney, or a written complaint with the complainant's department, alleging <br />that a City officer or employee engaged in improper government activity by: violating local campaign finance, lobbying, conflicts <br />ofinterest or governmental ethics laws, regulations or rules; violating the California Penal Code by misusing City resources; creating <br />a specified and substantial danger to public health or safety by failing to perform duties required by the officer or employee's City <br />position; or abusing his or her City position to advance a private interest. <br />(b) COMPLAINTS OF RETALIATION FOR HAVING FILED A COMPLAINT ALLEGING IMPROPER GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY. <br />(i) Administrative Complaints. Any city officer or employee, or former city officer or employee, who believes he or she has been the <br />subject of retaliation in violation of Subsection (a) of this Section may file a complaint with the Ethics Commission. The complaint <br />must be filed no later than two years after the date of the retaliation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.