Laserfiche WebLink
SEC. 4.105. COMPLAINTS OF IMPROPER GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY; INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES; REFERRAL TO <br />OTHER AGENCIES. <br />(a) COMPLAINTS. Any person may file a complaint with the Ethics Commission, Controller, District Attorney or City Attorney, or a <br />written complaint with the complainant's department alleging that a City officer or employee has engaged in improper government <br />activity by: violating local campaign finance, lobbying, conflicts of interest or governmental ethics laws, regulations or rules; violating <br />the California Penal Code by misusing City resources; creating a specified and substantial danger to public health or safety by <br />failing to perform duties required by the officer or employee's City position; or abusing his or her City position to advance a private <br />interest. <br />(b) ETHICS COMMISSION COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. The Ethics Commission shall investigate complaints filed under this <br />Section that allege violations of local campaign finance lobbying, conflicts of interest and governmental ethics laws pursuant to the <br />procedures specified in Charter Section C3.699-13 and the regulations adopted thereunder. Nothing in this subsection shall <br />preclude the Ethics Commission from referring any matter to any other City department, commission, board, officer or employee or <br />to other government agencies for investigation and possible disciplinary or enforcement action. The Ethics Commission may require <br />that any City department, commission, board, officer or employee report to the Ethics Commission on the referred matter. <br />(c) REFERRAL. The Ethics Commission shall refer complaints that do not allege a violation of law, regulation or rule that is within <br />the Ethics Commission's jurisdiction to the appropriate agency for investigation and possible disciplinary or enforcement action. The <br />Commission may conduct preliminary investigations into such complaints to determine whether the complaint contains sufficient <br />information to warrant referral. The Ethics Commission may require that any City department, commission, board, officer or <br />employee report to the Ethics Commission on the referred matter. (Added by Ord. 71-00, File No. 000358, App. 4/28/2000; <br />amended by Ord. 29-02, File No. 020017, App. 3/15/2002) <br />SEC. 4.110. DEFINITIONS. <br />For purposes of this Chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: <br />(a) The term "City" means the City and County of San Francisco, its departments, commissions and boards. <br />(b) The term "complainant's department" includes the complainant's supervisor, the executive director or highest ranking officer in <br />the complainant's department, and the board or commission overseeing the complainant's department. <br />(c) The term "preliminary investigation" shall be limited to, but need not include: review of the complaint and any documentary <br />evidence provided with the complaint; interview of the complainant; interview of the respondent, counsel to respondent and any <br />witnesses who voluntarily agree to be interviewed for this purpose; review of any relevant public documents and documents <br />provided voluntarily to the Commission. (Added by Ord. 71-00, File No. 000358, App. 4/28/2000; amended by Ord. 29-02, File No. <br />020017, App.3/15/2002) <br />SEC. 4.115.PROTECTION OF WHISTLEBLOWERS. <br />(a) RETALIATION PROHIBITED. No City officer or employee may terminate, demote, suspend or take other similar adverse <br />employment action against any City officer or employee because the officer or employee has in good faith filed a complaint with the <br />Ethics Commission, Controller, District Attorney or City Attorney, or a written complaint with the complainant's department, alleging <br />that a City officer or employee engaged in improper government activity by: violating local campaign finance, lobbying, conflicts <br />ofinterest or governmental ethics laws, regulations or rules; violating the California Penal Code by misusing City resources; creating <br />a specified and substantial danger to public health or safety by failing to perform duties required by the officer or employee's City <br />position; or abusing his or her City position to advance a private interest. <br />(b) COMPLAINTS OF RETALIATION FOR HAVING FILED A COMPLAINT ALLEGING IMPROPER GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY. <br />(i) Administrative Complaints. Any city officer or employee, or former city officer or employee, who believes he or she has been the <br />subject of retaliation in violation of Subsection (a) of this Section may file a complaint with the Ethics Commission. The complaint <br />must be filed no later than two years after the date of the retaliation.