My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 37 - Discuss and Consider Prepare an Ordinance Prohibiting Contracts with City Officials and their Immediate Family Members
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Item 37 - Discuss and Consider Prepare an Ordinance Prohibiting Contracts with City Officials and their Immediate Family Members
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 2:34:51 PM
Creation date
11/13/2024 10:30:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Item #
37
Date
11/19/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Ethics Commission shall investigate com-plaints of violations of Subsection (a) of this Section pursuant to the procedures <br />specified in San Francisco Charter Section C3.699-13 and the regulations adopted thereunder. The Ethics Commission may decline <br />to investigate complaints alleging violations of Subsection (a) if it determines that the same or similar allegations are pending with or <br />have been finally resolved by another administrative or judicial body. Nothing in this Subsection shall preclude the Ethics <br />Commission from referring any matter to any other City department, commission, board, officer or employee, or to other <br />government agencies for investigation and possible disciplinary or enforcement action. The Ethics Commission may refer matters to <br />the Department of Human Resources with a recommendation. The Ethics Commission may require that any City department, <br />commission, board, officer or employee report to the Ethics Commission on the referred matter. <br />(ii) Civil Complaints. Any City officer or employee who believes he or she has been the subject of retaliation in violation of <br />Subsection (a) of this Section may bring a civil action against the City officer or employee who committed the violation. Such action <br />must be filed no later than two years after the date of the retaliation. <br />(iii) Burden of Establishing Retaliation. In order to establish retaliation under this Section, a complainant must demonstrate by a <br />preponderance of the evidence that the complainant's engagement in activity protected under Subsection (a) was a substantial <br />motivating factor for the adverse employment action. The employer may rebut this claim if it demonstrates by a preponderance of <br />the evidence that it would have taken the same employment action irrespective of the complainant's participation in protected <br />activity. <br />(c) PENALTIES. <br />(i) Charter Penalties. Any City officer or employee who violates Subsection (a) of this Section may be subject to administrative <br />penalties pursuant to Charter Section C3.699-13. <br />(ii) Discipline by Appointing Authority. Any City officer or employee who violates Subsection (a) of this Section shall be subject to <br />disciplinary action up to and including dismissal by his or her appointing authority. If no disciplinary action is taken by the appointing <br />authority, the Ethics Commission may refer the matter to the Civil Service Commission for action pursuant to Charter Section <br />A8.341. <br />(iii) Civil Penalties. Any City officer or employee who violates Subsection (a) of this Section may be personally liable in a civil action <br />authorized under Subsection (b)(ii) of this Section for a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000. <br />(d) RESERVATION OF AUTHORITY. <br />(i) Civil Service Commission. Nothing in this Section shall interfere with the powers granted to the Civil Service Commission by the <br />San Francisco Charter. <br />(ii) Appointing Authority. Nothing in this Section shall interfere with the power of an appointing officer, manager, or supervisor to take <br />action with respect to any City officer or employee, provided that the appointing officer, manager, or supervisor reasonably believes <br />that such action is justified on facts separate and apart from the fact that the officer or employee filed a complaint with, or <br />cooperated with, an Ethics Commission investigation of such complaint; or filed a complaint with or provided information to the <br />Controller, District Attorney, City Attorney or the complainant's department. <br />(e) NOTICE OF WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTIONS. The Ethics Commission shall prepare, and each City department shall post a <br />notice of whistleblower protections. The notice shall be posted in a location that is conspicuous and accessible to all employees. <br />(Added by Ord. 71-00, File No. 000358, App. 4/28/2000; amended by Ord. 29-02, File No. 020017, App. 3/15/2002) <br />SEC. 4.120. CONFIDENTIALITY. <br />(a) WHISTLEBLOWER IDENTITY. Any individual who files a complaint under Section 4.105 of this Chapter may elect to have his or <br />her identity kept confidential as provided by Charter Section C3.699-13(a). Such election must be made at the time the complaint is <br />filed. <br />(b) COMPLAINTS AND INVESTIGATIONS. The Ethics Commission shall treat as confidential complaints made under Section 4.105 <br />of this Chapter, and related information, including but not limited to materials gathered and prepared in the course of investigation of
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.