My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RCR BRISTOL, LLC (2)
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
R
>
RCR BRISTOL, LLC (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2024 10:53:56 AM
Creation date
11/14/2024 11:13:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
RCR BRISTOL, LLC
Contract #
A-2024-182
Agency
Planning & Building
Council Approval Date
10/15/2024
Notes
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(d) Regulations that are in material conflict with this Agreement but that are <br /> reasonably necessary to protect the residents of the Project or the immediate community from a <br /> condition perilous to their health or safety.To the maximum extent possible,any such regulations <br /> shall be applied and construed so as to provide Owner with the rights and assurances provided <br /> under this Agreement. <br /> (e) Regulations that are not in material conflict with this Agreement or the <br /> Development Plan.For avoidance of doubt, any regulation,whether adopted by initiative or <br /> otherwise, limiting the rate or timing of development of the Property shall be deemed to <br /> materially conflict with the Development Plan and shall therefore not be applicable to the <br /> development of the Property. <br /> (f) Regulations that are in material conflict with the Development Plan; <br /> provided Owner has given written consent to the application of such regulations to Development <br /> of the Property. <br /> (g) Regulations that impose, levy, alter or amend fees, or charges relating to <br /> consumers or end users, including,without limitation,trash can placement, service charges and <br /> limitations on vehicle parking. <br /> (h) Regulations of other public agencies, including Development Impact <br /> Fees adopted or imposed by such other public agencies, although collected by City. <br /> 3.3.2. Subsequent Project Approvals. This Agreement shall not prevent City from <br /> exercising its rights under Government Code Section 65866 when acting on subsequent Project <br /> Approvals provided that such City actions do not materially conflict with this Agreement, the <br /> Development Plan,the Existing Land Use Regulations, and/or the Project Approvals. <br /> 3.3.3. Modification or Suspension by State or Federal Law. In the event that State, <br /> County or Federal laws or regulations,enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement, <br /> prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, such <br /> provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply <br /> with such State or Federal laws or regulations; provided,however,that this Agreement shall <br /> remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations <br /> and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such remaining provisions impractical to <br /> enforce. <br /> 3.3.4. Intent. The parties acknowledge and agree that City is restricted in its authority to <br /> limit certain aspects of its police power by contract and that the foregoing limitations, <br /> reservations and exceptions are intended to reserve to City all of its police power that cannot be <br /> or are not expressly so limited. This Agreement shall be construed, contrary to its stated terms if <br /> necessary,to reserve to City all such power and authority that cannot be or is not by this <br /> Agreement's express terms so restricted. <br /> 3.4. Regulation by Other Public Agencies. It is acknowledged by the parties that other public <br /> agencies not within the control of City may possess authority to regulate aspects of the <br /> development of the Property separately from or jointly with City and this Agreement does not <br /> limit the authority of such other public agencies. <br /> 3.5. Timing of Development. Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee <br /> Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal. 3d 465 (1984),that the failure of the parties in that <br /> -14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.