My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 19 - Resolution Repealing Resolution No. 2019-107 Regarding 2525 N Main St.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
02/04/2025
>
Item 19 - Resolution Repealing Resolution No. 2019-107 Regarding 2525 N Main St.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:17:32 AM
Creation date
1/29/2025 9:13:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/4/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Resolution No. 2025-xx <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />hundred and fifty-seven (157) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from <br />staff, the public and the City’s consultant team, the City Council voted that the <br />applications go back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration after further <br />consultation with the community; and <br />WHEREAS, in June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised plan consisting of <br />development 347 multi-family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces <br />(1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4 - <br />story residential building wrapped around a five-level parking structure with an amenity <br />deck on the sixth-level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main <br />Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93 - <br />acre site (the “June Revised Plan”); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly <br />noticed public hearing to consider the June Revised Plan. At the meeting, seventy- <br />seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and <br />one speaker was neutral. In addition, one-hundred (100) written comments were <br />received with six (6) in support and ninety-four (94) in opposition. After hearing all <br />relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City’s consultant team, the Planning <br />Commission vote resulted in an impasse; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, in October 2019, in response to comments received the applicant <br />submitted a further revised plan including redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with <br />444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential <br />buildings that would provide 256 for-rent multi-family residential units and a 167,253 <br />square foot central parking structure and a 284 space surface level parking lot which <br />also reduced the Project’s height, increased the Project’s setbacks, and modified the <br />Project entrance (“October Modified Project”); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City prepared “Clarifications to the Final EIR” to determine if the <br />October Modified Project would result in new or substantially increased environmental <br />effects than those analyzed in the EIR such that the EIR would require recirculation <br />prior to its certification; and <br />WHEREAS, the Clarifications to the Final EIR include detailed analysis, based <br />upon substantial evidence, that demonstrate that the Modified Project would not result <br />in any new or substantially greater impacts than are disclosed in the EIR, no new <br />mitigation measures beyond those identified in the EIR are required, and no additional <br />feasible alternatives or mitigation measures considerably different from others <br />previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the <br />project; and <br />WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly <br />noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018 -01, <br />General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and <br />solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-two (62) expressed opposition and <br />two (2) in expressed support the project. In addition, ninety-eight (98) individuals <br />submitted comments with ninety-four (94) in opposition and four (4) in support; and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.