My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
03/04/2025
>
Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2025 12:03:32 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 9:36:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
17
Date
3/4/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan <br />March 2018 <br />Park Area Zone <br />These areas, which account for about one-third of the land in <br />the corridor, should be heavily planted with trees to maximize <br />their visual appeal and environmental value (Figure 5-9 & <br />Figure 5-10). To address the anticipated pedestrian use of the <br />park zone, a greater variety of species, planted in more <br />irregular patterns is proposed behind the street -edge zone. <br />The increase in species diversity and its informal placement <br />also serves to visually "mesh" the parkway vegetation into the <br />canopy of the adjacent residential areas. The ground plane <br />should be kept free of visual obstructions, with emphasis on <br />turf, ground cover, or optional decomposed granite coverage. <br />Figure 5-10 depicts the criteria for using decomposed granite <br />as an alternative to turf or ground cover planting. Trees should <br />be drip or flood -irrigated wherever possible while sod and <br />ground cover areas should be spray irrigated using low <br />gallonage, vandal resistant nozzles. <br />Within the park zone, the Community Activity Node stretching <br />from 15` Street to Civic Center Drive should receive special <br />treatment. Because the adjacent areas are mostly commercial <br />in character and/or are targeted for commercial <br />redevelopment there is a lesser need to create a "buffer" <br />landscape. Increased pedestrian activity should also be <br />expected. Therefore, more of the park area should be paved <br />in this section of the corridor, with regular tree planting <br />appearing to be "cutout" from a paved matrix, rather than the <br />other way around. <br />Page 150 <br />Within this node, the street intersections should be distinctive <br />features of the streetscape. At each intersections corner, <br />groves of palm trees, raised ornamental planters, shelters, <br />special paving and other visually strong and unique features <br />should be considered (Figure 5-11). <br />Sidewalks and Buffer Treatment <br />At the street edge is proposed either a 25-foot public buffer <br />containing a 10-foot sidewalk or a 14-foot public buffer <br />containing an 8-foot sidewalk (Figure 5-7). The initial Specific <br />Plan Street Alignment (SPSA) called for the sidewalk to be <br />immediately adjacent to the street curb. Following further <br />study it was determined that the sidewalk should be placed <br />behind the remaining 15-foot or 6-foot buffer corresponding <br />to the 25-foot and 14-foot public buffers, respectively. This <br />decision allowed the sidewalk to be placed between two rows <br />of trees thus acquiring the most amenable of all possible <br />alignments. Because the second or inner row of trees falls on <br />private property, the design guidelines calls for continuous <br />parking frontage whereby the trees could be planted on <br />regularly spaced planting islands. <br />The spacing of the trees, therefore, is subject to the rhythm of <br />the parking space. One tree every three spaces (9 feet per <br />space) yields a spacing of 36 feet, which is adequate. The two <br />rows should be planted in a staggered fashion to maximize <br />canopy cover over the sidewalk. Slight adjustments in the <br />placement of the trees should be exercised in order to <br />accommodate underground utilities and new street lighting. <br />Flexibility on the exact dimension of the buffer alignment of <br />the sidewalk will also be necessary. At Mater Dei High School, <br />for example, there is no room for the buffer strip. In this <br />instance the sidewalk will have to be placed adjacent to the <br />curb line and, if feasible, trees planted on school property to <br />preserve street -tree continuity. Similar variations may be <br />required on other existing developments according to land <br />availability. In such instances trees should be planted not <br />more than 36 feet on center, in tree wells if necessary. <br />Lighting <br />Standard street lighting will be provided as part of the street <br />widening project. However, given the extent of area proposed <br />for pedestrian use, supplementary lighting to achieve a 1- <br />footcandle illumination level will be necessary. Along <br />sidewalk, plaza areas and gathering areas along the parkway, <br />pedestrian -scaled fixtures should be provided, They should be <br />placed in continuous rows and matched in style throughout <br />the Corridor, both in private and public zones. Figure 5-12 <br />illustrates the type of fixture proposed. These fixtures should <br />be spaced no more than five times their height (measured to <br />the light source) along the park zones and half as far in the <br />commercial zones, or as otherwise determined by an <br />engineer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.