Laserfiche WebLink
Walls <br />The Environmental Impact Statement requires the placement <br />of sound absorbing walls that are at least six -feet high on the <br />rear edge of the parcels abutting residential areas. The layout <br />guidelines for the walls as described in the Bristol Street <br />Widening Project should be maintained, with additional <br />considerations as follows: <br />• The walls should be divided in three sections: straight <br />runs, ornamental runs, and end runs. The purpose is to <br />adjust the design of the walls according to their proximity <br />to pedestrian activity, which increases towards the side <br />streets. <br />c The "straight runs" occupy the mid -sections of the <br />wall between street intersections. These runs should <br />be plain and simple, constructed of a single material <br />and without excessive ornamentation. The walls <br />should be planted with vines to eliminate the <br />opportunity for graffiti and to soften the wall and add <br />to 'green environment'. <br />o The "ornamental runs" extend 100 feet from a side <br />street right-of-way, and, owing to their proximity to <br />pedestrian activity, should offer more visual interest. <br />Espalier vines, colorful tiles, decorative caps and piers <br />should be considered as integral elements of the wall. <br />o The "end run" corresponds to the terminal sections of <br />the wall as they meet side streets. These sections <br />should be "opened -up" or perforated, allowing for <br />wrought iron or other see -through ornamentation, <br />including shrubbery, to soften their appearance as <br />they meet the side streets. The length of the "end <br />runs" should match adjacent building setbacks or be <br />about 20 feet in length, whichever is greater. The wall <br />ends should also act as "gateways" into the residential <br />areas. Pylons, posts, trellises or other similar features <br />should be considered, possibly incorporating <br />neighborhood identification signs and logos. The "end <br />runs" should be designed in pairs -two per side -street <br />- with each pair assuming a distinctive character <br />Figure 5-13 depicts the above concepts. <br />Figure 5-14 and Figure 5-15 depict the treatment at the end of <br />cul-de-sac streets. <br />Architectural Character <br />The commercial sites within the corridor are for the most part <br />small in area and therefore will be occupied by moderately <br />sized retail or office buildings. Following the land use concept, <br />these buildings will be spaced along the corridor rather than <br />grouped to form long, "hard" edges; they will appear more like <br />"structures in a park" than as a continuous urban frontage, <br />For this reason, the buildings should be designed so that all of <br />their visible sides display a reasonable architectural interest <br />and fagade articulation. Exposed, blank walls should be <br />avoided. The emphasis should be on breaking the regularity <br />of buildings, on treating them like ornaments in the landscape, <br />with as much fagade interest and articulation as possible <br />within the limits of feasibility. On long buildings (over 50 feet <br />in length), roof lines should be continuous but interrupted, <br />either by breaks in the roof lines or by wall extensions or <br />parapets; smaller buildings should be treated like pavilions, <br />with continuous parapet ornamentation or sloped roofs on all <br />side. In all cases, buildings should blend with the landscape <br />Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan <br />March 2018 <br />and the surrounding homes and businesses. Colors should be <br />soft and muted rather than bright and contrasting. <br />An emphasis on high quality design, materials and architecture <br />is recommended, with additional guidance available through <br />use of the City of Santa Ana's Design Guidelines and <br />Development Standards. However, in as much as the Specific <br />Plan dictates a specific approach to the corridor's architecture, <br />it must not preclude variety and/or refinements to the design <br />intent. In this vein, the design guidelines are purposefully <br />wide in scope, focusing not on the detail of the buildings but <br />rather on the broad issues of scale, massing and facade <br />articulation. They thus guard against possible gross <br />misinterpretation of the stated aesthetic objectives while <br />leaving ample room for creative and ingenious solutions. <br />Page 151 <br />