|
duly held by this City Council at which all written appeals, protests
<br />or objections were duly presented and read, and all persons desiring
<br />to be heard thereon were heard, and this City Council gave all persons
<br />present an opportunity to be heard in respect of any matter relating
<br />to said work or improvement, to any act or determination of the
<br />Director of Public Works of said City in relation thereto, to the
<br />contract for said work or the performance of said contract, to the
<br />correctness of said assessment or said diagram, or to any other act,
<br />determination or proceedings of said Director of Public Works, or to
<br />any matter relating to said work, the assessment district or the pro-
<br />ceedings therefor; and
<br />WHEREAS, all such persons desiring to be heard have been heard by this
<br />City Council, and this City Council is fully informed in the premises;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Aha, California,
<br />DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows:
<br />Section 1. That said hearing has been duly held; that each and every
<br />step in the proceeding prior to and including the hearing has been
<br />duly and regularly taken; that this City Council is satisfied with the
<br />correctness of the assessment, the diagram, the proceedings and all
<br />matters relating thereto, and all protests, objections, or appeals be
<br />and the same are hereby overruled and denied, and this City Council
<br />does hereby confirm said proceedings and said assessment.
<br />Section 2. That this resolution shall be entered upon the minutes of
<br />this City Council.
<br />ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 18th day of January, 1954.
<br />
<br />ATTEST:
<br />
<br />California.
<br />
<br />~'~k o?~th-~-Council of
<br />City of Santa Ana, California.
<br />
<br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
<br />COUNTY OF ORANGE )SS
<br />CITY OF SANTA ANA )
<br />
<br />(SEAL)
<br />
<br />APPROVED:
<br />
<br />~ity Attorney of the'City o~'
<br />Santa Ana, California.
<br />
<br />I, ERMA KEELER, Clerk of the Council of the City of Santa Ana,
<br />California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
<br />adopted by the City Council of said city and was approved by ~he Mayor
<br />of said city at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
<br />18th day of January, 1954, and that it was adopted by the following
<br />vote, to-wit:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen
<br />Noes, Councilmen
<br />Absent, Councilmen
<br />
<br />In Re
<br />Hearing
<br />Establish set-back
<br />lines on East First
<br />St.
<br />
<br />In Re
<br />Amend. Application
<br />Lois Michaels
<br />Reclassify property
<br />southwest corner
<br />17th and Lincoln
<br />
<br />(SEAL)
<br />
<br />was read, considered,
<br />following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes, Councilmen
<br />
<br /> Noes, Councilmen
<br /> Absent, Councilmen
<br />
<br />This being the date set
<br />
<br />City of Santa Ana, California."
<br />
<br />designated Resolution No. 54-4 and passed by the
<br />
<br />William Jerome, J.L.McBride,
<br />Thomas F. Larsen, Milford W.
<br />Courtney R. Chandler.
<br />None
<br />None
<br />
<br />Dahl,
<br />
<br />for hearing protests on the establishing of
<br />
<br />set-back lines on East First Stree~ from the Santa Fe tracks to the
<br />easterly city limits; no written or oral protests were received. On
<br />motion of Councilman Dahl, seconded by Jerome and carried, the Attorney
<br />
<br />was instructed to prepare an Ordinance to establish set-back lines.
<br />.
<br />This being the date set for hearing and no protests were received on the
<br />Amendment Application of Lois Michaels for the reclassification of an
<br />area approximately 2.65 acres in size, located on the south side of
<br />17th Street between Fairmont and Lincoln Streets, described as the
<br />east 15 feet of Block 16 and all of Block 21 of the Town of Santa Ana
<br />East, from the R-1 and R-2 Districts to the O=2 District. Robert L.
<br />Corfman, Attorney for the applicant stated the reasons why the property
<br />is not desirable for duplexes or residences and requested that the '
<br />amendment be granted. On motion of Councilman Jerome, seconded by
<br />Larsen and carried, the Attorney was instructed to prepare an Ordinance
<br />to reclassify the property from the R-1 and R-2 District to the C-2
<br />District.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|