bids and the report thereon, it was moved by Counc~lm~n Markel, seconded by Hubbard
<br />
<br />Reso. No. 57-241
<br />Awarding bonds
<br />Vehicle Parking
<br />District No. i Bonds
<br />
<br />and carried, the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br />"Resolution No. 57-240 of the City Council of the City of Santa Aha
<br />awarding $700,000 bonds of said City to the best bidder and rejecting
<br />all other bids"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Noes, Councilmen
<br />Absent, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., A. A. w~l 1,
<br />J. Ogden Markel, Dale H. Heinly
<br />None
<br />None,
<br />
<br />and Resolution No. 57-240 was declared adopted.
<br />
<br />The committee appointed to check and compute the bids on the bonds for which bids
<br />
<br />were opened previously durfng this meeting reported that the bid of Taylor & Compaz
<br />
<br />was ~,al ified, but not the best bid. A representative of Dempsey-Tegeler & Co.
<br />requested permission to withdraw their bid for an excusable mistake. It was movedill
<br />by Couscdlm-~ Hubbard.and seconded by Gould that the bid of Dempsey-Tegler & Co.
<br />
<br />Variance
<br />Vahan Apelian
<br />
<br />be accepted.
<br />
<br />Roll Ca]]: Ayes, Councilmen
<br /> Noes, Councilmen
<br /> Absent, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Motion failed.
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.
<br />A. A. F, 11, J. Ogden Markel, Dale H. Neinly
<br />None
<br />
<br /> On motion of Counci!m~n Gould, seconded by Hall and carried, the bid of First
<br /> California Company, for a net _-mount of $60,026.13 was accepted, all other bids
<br /> were rejected and checks ordered returned. The Mayor stated that the three bidder
<br /> concurred in the award of the bid to First California Company and expressed their
<br /> complete agreement that the bid should be so awarded. The Council having
<br /> imously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Gould,
<br /> seconded by N-!I and carried, the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Resolution No. 57-241 awarding $58,491.28 bonds of the City of
<br /> Santa Aha to the best b~dder and rejecting all other bids"
<br />
<br /> was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.,
<br /> A.A.~a]], Dale H. Heinly
<br /> Noes, Councilmen J. Ogden Markel
<br /> Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />Communication was read from the PlannfBg C0~!ssion recommending approval of varian
<br />applicatiun of Vahan and Arpine Apelian to permit the construction of two duplexes
<br />on property at 1702 South Flower Street, in the R-1 District, subject to condition~
<br />William Risko, 915 West Berkeley Street, objected to the variance and stated a
<br />petition signed by approximately fifty persons was presented at the previous meetiz
<br />and the protest should be given consideration. B.L.Nofferhert, 901 West Berkeley
<br />Street said he would not have ~ objection if there was only one house on the
<br />front of the property and a duplex at the rear of the lot. Vernon L. Springer,
<br />909 West Berkeley Street, also objected to the duplex and the men~er in which the
<br />
<br />property is mapped out for future construction. Webb Brown, representing the
<br />applicant, stated the duplexes will be approximately 100 feet ~o~ ~t~ garages
<br />would be on the rear of the lot. It was moved by Counci!m~n~d~ .~s conded by
<br />Hubbard, that the recummendation of the Planning Commission be approved and the
<br />
<br />variance granted subject to the conditions as set forth by the Coamaission.
<br />
<br />Roll Call Ayes, Counct I men
<br /> Noes, Councilmen
<br /> Absent, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Motion lost.
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.
<br />A. A. Wall, J. Ogden Markel, Dele N. Neinly
<br />None
<br />
<br />On motion of Couscilm~n Mark~l,
<br />..tlnued until October 21, 1957.
<br />
<br />seconded by Gould and carried, the matter was con-
<br />
<br />
<br />
|