Laserfiche WebLink
Tentative Tract <br />Map No. 2267 <br />L.W. Lefort Co. <br /> <br />Tentative Tract <br />Map No. 2235 <br />Robert D. Moore <br /> <br />Map of Tract <br />No. 2107 <br />Roy R. Russell <br /> <br />and on motion of Councilman Govld, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the affidavits <br />were received and filed. The Mayor asked the Clerk if she had received any written <br />protests or objections against the doing of the proposed work. The Clerk stated <br />she had received a written protest frcm L. K. Bader, 2014 Ha! ! aday Street, The Cler} <br />said letters were received from Mrs. August E. Pfi~i~ and Erbin Lee and Maxine H. <br />Wise requesting information and that the letters had been referred to the Director <br />of Public Works who answered the questions. On motion of Counci~m~ Hubbard, <br />seconded by w~ and carried, the communicationswere received and filed. The Mayor <br />asked if anyone in the audience wished to protest, and Clifford Frazer, 2049 South <br />Halladay, said he did not wishto protest but requested assurance that the improve- <br />ments already in place on his property would not be removed as they had been inspecte <br />by the City but would like information as to what part of the expense the City is <br />going to pay on the cost of certain streets and intersections. The Director of <br />Public Works answered the questions to the satisfaction of Mr. Frazer. Glen H. Sha~ <br />2060 H~]]aday Street, C. Chapman Lantz, 2209 South Halladay Street, Bernard B. Benso~ <br />1002 East St. Andrews Place, requested information concerning the type of improve- <br />ments rob e made, the cost per foot for the resurfacing, what percentage of the cost <br />of the improvements will the City pay, and how soon will the work be started. The <br />Director of Public Works satisfactorily answered all the questions and co~ents and <br />on motion of Councilm~m Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, the hearing was dec- <br />clared closed. On motion of Counc~lm~n Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the <br />one protest was overruled and denied. <br /> <br />Roll Call Ayes, <br /> <br /> CounQ'~ i men <br /> <br />Noes, Councilmen <br />Absent, Counc~ ~ m~n <br /> <br />Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., <br />A.A.M~ Dale H. Heinly <br />None <br />J. Ogden Markel <br /> <br />The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of <br /> <br />Counctlm~ Hubbard, seconded by Hal~ and carried, the following Resolution entitled: <br /> <br /> R solution No. 58-176 of the City Council of the City of Santa Aha, <br /> California, ordering work to be done on St. Andrew Place and other <br /> streets in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 58-151" <br /> <br />in Assezsment District No. 199, was considered and passed by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, St~ey C. Gould, Jr., <br /> <br />Noes, Councilmen None <br />Absent, Councilmen J. Ogden Markel <br /> <br />Mr. Herman Wilson on behalf of L.W.Lefort Company stated the conditions as imposed <br />on Tentative Tract Map No. 2267 are satisfactory to his client with the e~eption <br />of condition No. 1. On motion of Counc~m~ Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried~ <br />Tentative Tract Map No. 2267 filed by L.W.Lefort Company on appro~!m~tely 30 acres <br />to be divided into 28 lots located on the south side of Delhi Road and approximatel <br />289 feet west of Main Street, was approved subject to conditions. <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Could, seconded by Hubbard and carried, Tentative Tract Map <br />No. 2235 filed by Robert D. Moore on property located on the eastern side of Center <br />Street, approximately 330 feet north of Edinger Street, representing five acres to be <br />divided into 2B lots, was approved subject to conditions. <br /> <br />On motion of Counci!~a~ Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, Map of Tract No.2107 <br />filed by Roy R.~ Russell on five lots on the west side of Baker Street between 18th <br />and 22nd Streets, and bond in the amount of $600.00 were approved, license tax in <br />the sum of $250.00 accepted and agreement covering improvements was ordered signed. <br /> <br /> <br />