Tentative Tract
<br />Map No. 2267
<br />L.W. Lefort Co.
<br />
<br />Tentative Tract
<br />Map No. 2235
<br />Robert D. Moore
<br />
<br />Map of Tract
<br />No. 2107
<br />Roy R. Russell
<br />
<br />and on motion of Councilman Govld, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the affidavits
<br />were received and filed. The Mayor asked the Clerk if she had received any written
<br />protests or objections against the doing of the proposed work. The Clerk stated
<br />she had received a written protest frcm L. K. Bader, 2014 Ha! ! aday Street, The Cler}
<br />said letters were received from Mrs. August E. Pfi~i~ and Erbin Lee and Maxine H.
<br />Wise requesting information and that the letters had been referred to the Director
<br />of Public Works who answered the questions. On motion of Counci~m~ Hubbard,
<br />seconded by w~ and carried, the communicationswere received and filed. The Mayor
<br />asked if anyone in the audience wished to protest, and Clifford Frazer, 2049 South
<br />Halladay, said he did not wishto protest but requested assurance that the improve-
<br />ments already in place on his property would not be removed as they had been inspecte
<br />by the City but would like information as to what part of the expense the City is
<br />going to pay on the cost of certain streets and intersections. The Director of
<br />Public Works answered the questions to the satisfaction of Mr. Frazer. Glen H. Sha~
<br />2060 H~]]aday Street, C. Chapman Lantz, 2209 South Halladay Street, Bernard B. Benso~
<br />1002 East St. Andrews Place, requested information concerning the type of improve-
<br />ments rob e made, the cost per foot for the resurfacing, what percentage of the cost
<br />of the improvements will the City pay, and how soon will the work be started. The
<br />Director of Public Works satisfactorily answered all the questions and co~ents and
<br />on motion of Councilm~m Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, the hearing was dec-
<br />clared closed. On motion of Counc~lm~n Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the
<br />one protest was overruled and denied.
<br />
<br />Roll Call Ayes,
<br />
<br /> CounQ'~ i men
<br />
<br />Noes, Councilmen
<br />Absent, Counc~ ~ m~n
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.,
<br />A.A.M~ Dale H. Heinly
<br />None
<br />J. Ogden Markel
<br />
<br />The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of
<br />
<br />Counctlm~ Hubbard, seconded by Hal~ and carried, the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br /> R solution No. 58-176 of the City Council of the City of Santa Aha,
<br /> California, ordering work to be done on St. Andrew Place and other
<br /> streets in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 58-151"
<br />
<br />in Assezsment District No. 199, was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, St~ey C. Gould, Jr.,
<br />
<br />Noes, Councilmen None
<br />Absent, Councilmen J. Ogden Markel
<br />
<br />Mr. Herman Wilson on behalf of L.W.Lefort Company stated the conditions as imposed
<br />on Tentative Tract Map No. 2267 are satisfactory to his client with the e~eption
<br />of condition No. 1. On motion of Counc~m~ Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried~
<br />Tentative Tract Map No. 2267 filed by L.W.Lefort Company on appro~!m~tely 30 acres
<br />to be divided into 28 lots located on the south side of Delhi Road and approximatel
<br />289 feet west of Main Street, was approved subject to conditions.
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Could, seconded by Hubbard and carried, Tentative Tract Map
<br />No. 2235 filed by Robert D. Moore on property located on the eastern side of Center
<br />Street, approximately 330 feet north of Edinger Street, representing five acres to be
<br />divided into 2B lots, was approved subject to conditions.
<br />
<br />On motion of Counci!~a~ Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, Map of Tract No.2107
<br />filed by Roy R.~ Russell on five lots on the west side of Baker Street between 18th
<br />and 22nd Streets, and bond in the amount of $600.00 were approved, license tax in
<br />the sum of $250.00 accepted and agreement covering improvements was ordered signed.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|