Laserfiche WebLink
102 <br /> <br />Variance Appl. No. 1,065 <br />Lenney Homes <br /> <br />Variance Appl. No. 1062 <br />George Wo Allison <br /> <br />Variance Appl. No. 1060 <br />Frieda Belinfante <br /> <br />/ Request <br /> Mrs. Mark Andrews <br /> for street name change <br /> <br />Communication <br />Planning Commission <br />Reso. No. 59-21 <br />Approving Map and declaring <br />intention to vacate small <br />portion of Public Service <br />Easement <br />(set hearing date) <br /> <br />Communication <br />Planning Commission <br />(study of Bristol <br />Street) <br /> <br />Reso. No. 59-22 <br />Accept Deeds <br />Anthony Tummillo et al <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hall and carried, the recommendation of <br />the p]annt~g Commission was approved and Variance Application No. 1065 of Leaney <br />Homes granted to permit erection of fifty steEle-family homes with a 20-foot front <br />yard rather than the required 30-feet of the R-1 District, on a residential sub- <br />division situated generally wrest of and contiguous to Mabury Street, east of the <br />prolongation of Wright Street and between 17th Street and Washington Avenue, in R-1 <br />District, subject to a condition. <br /> <br /> Communication was read from the Planning Commission recommending denial of Variance <br /> Application No. 1062 filed by George W. ~llison to permit construction of two add- <br /> itional units over garage on rear part of the lot on property situated at 602 South <br /> Ross Street, in R-2 District. The applicant stated his property is located adjacent <br /> <br /> to R-3 zoning and requested that the Variance be granted. On motion of Council- <br /> <br />,mn Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the recomw~ndation of the Planning <br />Commission was approved and the Variance denied. <br /> <br />Communication was read from Attorney H. Rodger Howell requesting that action be <br />continued until February 16, 1959 on Variance Application No. 1060 filed by Frieda <br />Belinfante, and on motion of Coll~cilm~n Go~d, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the <br />request was granted and the communication ordered filed. <br /> <br />C~ication was read from the planntn~ Commission recommending that no action be <br />taken on request of Mrs. Mark Andrews for a street name. ch-~e of East Fruit Street <br />to East Ninth Street, and on motion of Councflm~.n Hubbard, seconded by Hall and <br />carried, the communication was received and filed. <br /> <br />Communication was read from the planning Commtesion reCr,ramending approval of request <br />of the Deportment of Public Works for vacation of a portion of a public service <br />easement located approximately 1373 feet south of Delhi Road and approxfmately 654 <br />feet east of Bristol Street for sanitary and storm water sewers, and on motion of <br />Councilmen Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the commmmication was received <br />and filed. The Council having ,m-n~m~usly waived the reading of the Resolution, <br />on motion of Co~lnc]lm-n Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the following <br />Resolution entitled: <br /> <br /> "Resolution No. 59-21 approving map and declaring intention to vacate <br /> a small portion of a public service easement" <br /> <br />setting t~e date of bearing on March 2, 1959, was considered and passed by the <br />following vote: <br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., <br /> A.A.Hall, J. Ogden Markel <br />Noes, Councilmen None <br />Absent, Councilmen Dale B. Heinly <br /> <br />On motion of Counctlm~n Hubbard, seconded by GoUld and carried, the communication <br />from the Planning Com~t esion was received and filed advising that a study of Bristol <br />Street with regard to possible commercial development is now being made and a state- <br />ment of policy regarding the matter will be forthcoming at an early date. <br /> <br />The Col=lcil having ,ma-traously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of <br />Counc~lm~n Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the following Resolution entitled: <br /> <br /> "Resolution No. 59-22 accepting deeds where the City is paying <br /> no cash consideration" <br /> <br />from Anthony and Mary Tummillo for stx~et easement on the easterly side of North <br />Main Street, north of 20th Street; from Lee and Leonise B~yle for street easement <br />on the easterly side of Main Street, south of Ninth Street; from Theodore D. and <br />Ruth A. MacBird for easement for a covered drainage structure over a portion of Lot <br />1 in Tract No. 2648; from John B. Kilroy and Long Beach Leasing Corporation for <br />drainage easement in ~$ NO. 2650, and a further deed for drainage easement <br /> <br /> <br />