|
Preliminary Record
<br />of Survey Map :,
<br />John T. Allison /~
<br />
<br />Tentative Tract Map
<br />No. 2887 - Thomas M. ~
<br />and Ruth E. Flippen et al
<br />
<br />Map of Tract ~
<br />No. 3273 ~ ~
<br />Hugh M. Neighbour, Jr.
<br />
<br />Variance Appl. No. 1060
<br />Frieda Belinfante
<br />Reso. No. 59-31 //v'
<br />
<br />Variance Appl. No. 1064
<br />Clarence E. Dickenson /'~
<br />
<br /> On motion of Co%~lct]mau Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, Prelfmtnary Record
<br /> of Slirvey Map filed by John T. Allison, cutting into two lots property located be-
<br /> tween and fronting on Highland Street and Brook Street Immediately north of the
<br /> termination of Baker Street, north of Cubbon Street, was approved subject to con-
<br /> ditions.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Counc~m-, Hubbard, seconded by Markel and carried, Tentative Tract
<br />
<br /> Map No. 2887, filed by Don Christeson on property owned by Thomas M. and Ruth E.
<br /> Flippen, Clement L. and Se]ma A. McFarland, and Julia H. Pretzer, creating 89 single-
<br /> family residential lots located generally at the southwest corner of the intersect-
<br /> ion of the Santa Aha River and Garden Grove Boulevard Immediately west of the Orange
<br /> County Flood Control Yard, was approved subject to conditions.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Counc~lm~n Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, Map of Tract No.
<br />
<br /> 3273 filed by Hugh M. Neighbour, Jr., for thm dedication of Marion Way and Bristol
<br /> Street and all vehicular access rights on Bristol Street are dedicated to the City,
<br /> was approved subject to the posting of a bond approved by the Attorney and Director
<br /> of Public Works, license fee in the sum of $250.00 accepted and agreement covering
<br /> improvements ordered signed.
<br />
<br /> Cnmmunication was read from the Planning Commission recommending denial of Variance
<br /> Application No. 1060 filed by Frieda Belfneante to conduct a music school to teach
<br /> lessons on instruments of the symphony orchestra to individ,,els and groups, on
<br /> property situated at 418 South Bristol Street, in R-2 District. Attorney N. Rodger
<br /> Howell, representing the applicant, stated Bristol Street is a very heavily travelled
<br /> highway and carries traffic of more than 17,0OO cars per day m~ing it unsuitable
<br /> for a residential area. This property is a large corner lot, a portion of which
<br /> is entirely vacant; there is a paved alley to the rear of the property which will
<br /> allow access thereto, and there is adequate area for off-street parking. Mr. Casey,
<br /> an independent real estate broker, stated he attempted to sell property on Bristol
<br /> Street but there were no offers made for residential use. The Council having
<br /> ,,r~nimously waived the readt~ of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman
<br /> seconded by Gould and carried, the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Resolution No. 59-31 granting Variance Application No. 1060 where
<br /> Planning Commission recom~ended denial and imposing conditions
<br /> upon the granttn~ thereof"
<br />
<br /> was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr., A. A.
<br /> J. Ogden Mar~el, Dele H. Neinly
<br /> Noes, Councilmen None
<br /> Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />Co~nunication was read f~m the Planning Commission recommending denial of Variance
<br />Application No. 1064 filed by Clarence E. Dickenson to build a one-story medical
<br />building of stucco construction, with three proposed offices with nineteen parking
<br />st-] ] s, in accordance with revised plot plan, on property situated at 1313 and 1401
<br />West St. Gertrude Place, in R-3 District. Joe 0. Barker, Mr. Van Yoder and Mr.
<br />Phillips, objected to the Variance and felt that it would be detrimental to their
<br />properties, a precedent would be set if this variance is allowed and it would not
<br />be to the best interest of the area. Clifford Kent, representing the applicant,
<br />requested that the Variance be granted, on motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by
<br />Markel and carried, the recom-~ndation of the Planning C~mmission was approved and
<br />the Variance denied. It was moved by Counc~lm-- Gould, seconded by Markel and
<br />carried, that the previous action denying Variance Application NO. 1064 be amended
<br />
<br />
<br />
|