Hearing
<br />Establish future
<br />right-of-way lines
<br />Standard Avenue,
<br />Ritchey Street
<br />and Fruit Street
<br />Ordinance
<br />
<br />Variance Appl.No.12~O
<br />Orange County
<br />Law Building
<br />
<br />Councilman Gould withdrew his motion, with the consent of the second. On motion
<br />of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following Ordinance
<br />entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Ordinance establishing future right-of-way lines along portions
<br /> of Fourth and Eighth Streets"
<br />
<br />was introduced, considered and placed on file for second reading.
<br />
<br />Roll Call Ayes, CounciLmen Royal E. Hubbard, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br /> Noes, Councilmen Stanley C. Gould, Jr.
<br /> Absent, Councilmen None
<br /> Not Voting, Councilmen Dale H. Heinly
<br />
<br />The Mayor stated that the hearings to establish future right-of-way lines on
<br />Standard Avenue and on Ritchey Street were closed at a previous meeting, and this
<br />is the date set for the continued hearing to establish future right-of-way lines on
<br />both sides of Fruit Street, between French Street and Grand Avenue, hO feet, meas-
<br />ured from and at r~ght angles to the survey center line. Attorney Winthrop Gordon,
<br />616 First Western Bank Building, representing Elsa Armstrong, W. T. Cox, Ferris
<br />
<br />Scott and Walter R. Robb, advised his clients' properties in Tract 344 run length-
<br />wise~ east-to-west, and if l0 feet is taken for a right-of-way, about one-fourth
<br />of each lot will be lost. Also, in the Hawkins addition, if 20 feet is taken,
<br />about two-fifths of each lot will be lost to the property owner, and there are
<br />buildings on all lots, except Lot 9, Block B in the Hawkins Addition. It was pointed
<br />out to Attorney Gordon that future widening was imperative due to the amount of
<br />traffic on Fruit Street, as it is the m~jor east-west access to the center of town,
<br />
<br />and the City is prepared to negotiate for the purchase of property for the widening
<br /> The hearing was declared closed.
<br />of streets where it is absolutely necessary./ On motion of Councilman Beinly, secon-
<br />
<br />ded by Hubbard and carried, the following Ordinance entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Ordinance establishing future right-of-way lines along portions
<br /> of Standard Avenue, Ritchey Street and Fruit Street"
<br />
<br />was introduced, ccasidered and placed on file for second reading.
<br />
<br />Roll Call Ayes, Councilmen
<br />
<br /> Noes, Councilmen
<br /> Absent, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, Dale H. Heinly,
<br />Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br />Sta-ley C. Gould, Jr.
<br />None
<br />
<br />C~mmunication was read from the Planning Commission recommending approval of Var-
<br />lance Application No. 1240, filed by Orange County Law Building, to extend an exist-
<br />lng law and accounting office building at 812 North Birch Street, in the R-3 Dis-
<br />trict, and also use the property at 815 North Birch Street, for the purpose of park-
<br />lng for the occupants and clients of proposed building to be erected at 812 North
<br />Birch Street, in the P-PK District, leaving a ten-foot rear area ope~ and subject
<br />to conditions. Councilman Heinly disqualified himself on this matter. Attorney
<br />Milford W. Dahl, 401 W. Eighth Street, stated their property has a 50-foot frontage
<br />and a llO-foot depth, and are debating whether to build up to the property line of
<br />55 feet or leave a 10-foot driveway for parking, which is so necessary at this time
<br />for their present use and the peak tax season. We have a supplement to our appli-
<br />cation which would give us a ten-foot area to the north for a driveway, or the rear
<br />portion of the property, and the alternative to build to 45 or 55 feet of the build-
<br />ing. On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, Variance
<br />Application No. 1240, insofar as it pertains to the use of the property for a park-
<br />ing lot at 815 North Birch Street, was granted subject to conditions; and that
<br />action be continued on Variance Application No. 1240, insofar as it pertains to the
<br />extension of an existing law and accounting office building, at 812 North Birch
<br />Street, for a period of six months or until the applicant notifies the City Council.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|