Laserfiche WebLink
Hearing <br />Establish future <br />right-of-way lines <br />Standard Avenue, <br />Ritchey Street <br />and Fruit Street <br />Ordinance <br /> <br />Variance Appl.No.12~O <br />Orange County <br />Law Building <br /> <br />Councilman Gould withdrew his motion, with the consent of the second. On motion <br />of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following Ordinance <br />entitled: <br /> <br /> "Ordinance establishing future right-of-way lines along portions <br /> of Fourth and Eighth Streets" <br /> <br />was introduced, considered and placed on file for second reading. <br /> <br />Roll Call Ayes, CounciLmen Royal E. Hubbard, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall <br /> Noes, Councilmen Stanley C. Gould, Jr. <br /> Absent, Councilmen None <br /> Not Voting, Councilmen Dale H. Heinly <br /> <br />The Mayor stated that the hearings to establish future right-of-way lines on <br />Standard Avenue and on Ritchey Street were closed at a previous meeting, and this <br />is the date set for the continued hearing to establish future right-of-way lines on <br />both sides of Fruit Street, between French Street and Grand Avenue, hO feet, meas- <br />ured from and at r~ght angles to the survey center line. Attorney Winthrop Gordon, <br />616 First Western Bank Building, representing Elsa Armstrong, W. T. Cox, Ferris <br /> <br />Scott and Walter R. Robb, advised his clients' properties in Tract 344 run length- <br />wise~ east-to-west, and if l0 feet is taken for a right-of-way, about one-fourth <br />of each lot will be lost. Also, in the Hawkins addition, if 20 feet is taken, <br />about two-fifths of each lot will be lost to the property owner, and there are <br />buildings on all lots, except Lot 9, Block B in the Hawkins Addition. It was pointed <br />out to Attorney Gordon that future widening was imperative due to the amount of <br />traffic on Fruit Street, as it is the m~jor east-west access to the center of town, <br /> <br />and the City is prepared to negotiate for the purchase of property for the widening <br /> The hearing was declared closed. <br />of streets where it is absolutely necessary./ On motion of Councilman Beinly, secon- <br /> <br />ded by Hubbard and carried, the following Ordinance entitled: <br /> <br /> "Ordinance establishing future right-of-way lines along portions <br /> of Standard Avenue, Ritchey Street and Fruit Street" <br /> <br />was introduced, ccasidered and placed on file for second reading. <br /> <br />Roll Call Ayes, Councilmen <br /> <br /> Noes, Councilmen <br /> Absent, Councilmen <br /> <br />Royal E. Hubbard, Dale H. Heinly, <br />Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall <br />Sta-ley C. Gould, Jr. <br />None <br /> <br />C~mmunication was read from the Planning Commission recommending approval of Var- <br />lance Application No. 1240, filed by Orange County Law Building, to extend an exist- <br />lng law and accounting office building at 812 North Birch Street, in the R-3 Dis- <br />trict, and also use the property at 815 North Birch Street, for the purpose of park- <br />lng for the occupants and clients of proposed building to be erected at 812 North <br />Birch Street, in the P-PK District, leaving a ten-foot rear area ope~ and subject <br />to conditions. Councilman Heinly disqualified himself on this matter. Attorney <br />Milford W. Dahl, 401 W. Eighth Street, stated their property has a 50-foot frontage <br />and a llO-foot depth, and are debating whether to build up to the property line of <br />55 feet or leave a 10-foot driveway for parking, which is so necessary at this time <br />for their present use and the peak tax season. We have a supplement to our appli- <br />cation which would give us a ten-foot area to the north for a driveway, or the rear <br />portion of the property, and the alternative to build to 45 or 55 feet of the build- <br />ing. On motion of Councilman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, Variance <br />Application No. 1240, insofar as it pertains to the use of the property for a park- <br />ing lot at 815 North Birch Street, was granted subject to conditions; and that <br />action be continued on Variance Application No. 1240, insofar as it pertains to the <br />extension of an existing law and accounting office building, at 812 North Birch <br />Street, for a period of six months or until the applicant notifies the City Council. <br /> <br /> <br />