Laserfiche WebLink
Variance Appt.No .1244 <br />Joe Montano <br /> <br />Variance Appl.No.l146 <br />First General <br />Baptist Church <br />Extension of time <br /> <br />Variance Appl.No.1083 <br />Farmers Underwriters <br />Association-Extension <br />of time <br /> <br />Communication <br />Plann. Commission <br />Reso.No.60-18 <br />Estab. R/W lines <br />Memory Lane and <br />Garden Grove Blvd. <br />(set hearing date) <br /> <br />Roll Call Ayes, <br /> <br /> Noes, <br /> Absent, <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />property is 67 feet wide and 125 feet deep, and it is impossible to get the com- <br />plete benefit without adequate parking. The applicant has no objection to erecting <br />a fence or block w~ll, limiting the access to 16th Street completely. On motion <br />of Councilman Hein3~, seconded by Gould and carried, the matter was postponed until <br />the next meeting for further consideration. <br /> <br />Communication was read from the Planning Commission recommending denial of Variance <br />Application No. 12~4, filed by Joe Montano, to convert front house to a duplex and <br />construct an apartment over garages in the rear, on property at 633 East Central <br />Street,in the R-1 District. Mr. Donald Vance, 1134 W. Cubbon Street, representing <br />the applicant, stated this moved-in house was taken from the Civic Center area and <br />there was an apartment over the garage. It is a two-story house, and it would <br />exist as a single-family residence; the house would not be divided. The area is <br />developing into Commercial and Manufacturing Districts, and it is desired to make <br />it an R-3 Zone. It was moved by Councilman Heinly and seconded by Brewer that <br />the Variance Application be denied. <br /> <br /> Co%mcilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Dale H. Heinly, <br /> Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall <br /> Councilmen Stanley C. Gould, Jr. <br /> Councilmen None <br /> <br />Councilman Hubbard left the meeting at 9:50 P.M. <br /> <br />It was moved by Cotmcflm-n Gould, seconded by Brewer and carried, that the matter <br />be reconsidered. It was moved by Councilman Gould, seconded by Brewer and carried, <br />that the matter be postponed to February 15th, and the photographs as submitted <br />were received and filed. <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Nei n ]~, seconded by Brewer and carried, the recommendation <br />of the Planning Commission was approved and a ninety-day extension of time granted <br />on Variance Application No. ll~6, filed by Rev. Edgar Shewmaker, First General <br />Baptist Church, to permit erection of a church on property at 15592 South Sullivan <br />Street. <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Hetnly, seconded by Gould and carried, the recommendation <br /> <br />of the Planning Commission was approved and a ninety-day extension of time was <br />granted from the date 4~aec~sion is rendered by either the Appe'llate Court or the <br />Superior Court, on Variance Application No. 1083, filed by Farmers Underwriters <br />Association, to permit the construction of an office building for a regional opera- <br />tional and administrative office for the Farmers Insurance Group, on the interior <br />area of property on the east side of Flower Street, between Memory Lane and the <br />Santa Aha Freeway, subject to conditious. <br /> <br />Co,~unication was read from the Planning Commission rect~,mending approval to estab- <br />lish future right-of-way lines on Memory Lane and Garden Grove Boulevard, from <br />Flower Street to the west corporate limits (approximately 1BO feet west of the <br />center line of Townley Street ) measured 50 feet from and at right angles to the <br />survey center line. The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Reso- <br />lution, on motion of CounciLman Heinly, seconded by Gould and carried, the following <br />Resolution entitled: <br /> <br /> "Resolution No. 60-18 declaring intention to establish future <br /> right-of-way lines along Memory Lane and Garden Grove Boulevard <br /> between Flower Street and the west City limits" <br /> <br />setting the date of hearing on March 7, 1960, was considered and passed by the <br /> <br />following vote: <br /> <br /> <br />