|
~ Cc~nunications On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following com-
<br /> Bo~mdary Commission,
<br /> munications were received and filed:
<br />
<br />City of Orange, et al
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary Commfssion regarding proposed annexation of territory to the
<br /> City of Santa Aha "Fairhaven and Esplanade West Annex," advisim~ the boundaries of
<br /> the proposed annexation are not definite and certain, and all documents were re-
<br /> ferred back to the City for correctic~ and resubmission,
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary Commission regarding proposed annexation of territory to the
<br /> City of Santa Aha "Vanderlip and Newport Northwest Annexation," advising the boun-
<br /> daries of the proposed annexation are reasonably definite and certain, although it
<br /> overlaps proposed ~nexation No. 149 to the City of Orange, approved by Boundary
<br /> Commission November 21, 1960, and proposed Marshall annexation to the City of
<br /> Tustin, approved by Boundary Co~mission October 31, 1~60,
<br />
<br /> Frcm the Boundary Con~nission regarding proposed annexation of territory to the
<br /> .~ City of Orange "Annexation No. 149 - Revised," advising the boundaries of the pro-
<br /> posed annexation are reasonably definite and certain, although it overlaps proposed
<br /> "Fairhaven and Esplanade West Annexation,"
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary Ccmn~ission regarding proposed annexation of territory to the
<br /> City of Costa Mesa "Adams No. 2 Annexation," advising the boundaries of the pro-
<br /> ~ posed annexation are reasonably definite and certain although it cuts property
<br /> logically,
<br />
<br /> Frc~ the Boundary Co-w.~ssion regarding proposed annexation of territory to the
<br /> City of Garden Grove "Annexation No. 102," advising the boundaries of the proposed
<br /> annexation are reasonably definite and certain although it cuts property lines,
<br />
<br /> Fr~n the Boundary Conmaission regarding proposed annexation of territory to the
<br />~i~ City of Tustin "South Tustin Avenue Annexation No. 2," advising the boundaries of
<br /> the proposed annexation are reasonably definite and certain although it cuts pr~-
<br /> erty logically,
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary CommisSion regarding petition for the proposed withdrawals
<br /> ~ from the Orange County Lighting Districts (Tracts Nos. 2036 and 3~89) advising the
<br /> ~' ~o~u~d~ries Of the pro~osed.?ithdrawals are. ~ea~onably definite and certain; (Tract
<br /> 20~b West Santa Ana ~x" and Tract No.3~9."Lincoln and Virginia W. Annex ),
<br /> From the City of Orange submitting copy of Resolution No. 168~ proposing to
<br /> ~%annex certain property located south~st of Katella and Glassell Avemues, designate~$
<br /> "Annexation No. 1~5,"
<br />
<br /> From the City of Orange submitting copy of Resolutlom N~.1685 proposing to
<br /> annex certain property located southeast of Wanda Street and Taft Avenue, designate~
<br /> "Annexation No. 1~6,"
<br />
<br />Frc~ the City of Orange submitting copy of Resolution No. 1688 proposing to
<br />%~9~annex certain property located northwest of Taft Street and Tustin Avenue, designated
<br /> "Annexation No. 147,"
<br />
<br /> From the City of Orange submitting copy of Resolutio~ Ne.1689 proposing to
<br />annex certain property located southwest of Chapman Avenue and Yorba Street, desig-
<br />nated "Annexation No.
<br />
<br /> From the 'City of Fountain Valley enclosing certified copy of Resolution No. 10
<br /> requesting the California Division of Highways to expedite construction of the San
<br />.~'~Diego Freeway, and expressing appreciation for any Council action taken to assist
<br /> them in accelerating the construction of this freeway,
<br />
<br /> From the City of San Clemente submitting certified copy of Resolution No.l191,
<br /> urging formation of an Inter-City Study Cozmnittee to analyze Orange County Budget
<br /> and EEpenses, and stating that Councils desiring to participate in this study notif
<br /> the Mayor of San Cle~ente, in order that a meeting date may be set for determinatio
<br /> of establishing this program,
<br />
<br /> From Towner Manufacturing Co. advising they are interested in discussing with
<br />the City the purchase of the amall triangular lot to the north and east of their
<br />~p~/Ccmpany property, or a trade involving their rights in a portion of the Flood ContrOl
<br /> property being used by Alona Park for the triangular lot,
<br />
<br /> From the Library Director, City Public Library, submitting Two Year Report,
<br /> Fiscal Years 1958-59 & 1959-60,
<br />
<br /> From Western Missionary Army, dated November 29, 1960, with copy of their
<br />employees' contract; excerpt of City of Torrance Ordinance 1102 reference Fund Soli
<br />citations; and letter from their Attorneys Morse & Selwyn, Hollywood, citing "not
<br />guilty" ruling of Judge John A. Shidler, for solicitation without a license by a
<br />religious organization in the City~f Hermosa Beach; also a Notice of Intent to
<br />solicit for religious purposes in the City of Santa Aha, stating their home mission
<br />aries and perzo~l evangelists are ministers and/or bible students and may either
<br />volunteer their services or receive a portion of the contribution donated to the
<br />Western Missionary Arm~ not to exceed 60~,
<br />
<br /> Application of Cross Town Suburban Bus Lines, Inc., before the Public Utilitie~
<br />Cc~m~ssion, for authority to discontinue portions of, and to re-route and extend
<br />Route No. 27, Santa Aha, Marine~d Line, and giving notice of a hearing on Decembe~
<br />1, 1960, 9:30 A.M., in the Commission Courtroom, 145 South Spring Street, Los
<br />Angeles,
<br />
<br /> Application of Dyke Water Company, before the Public Utilities Co-=~ission, for
<br /> an Order authorizing it to sell, transfer and convey its water system to the City
<br />~')of Garden Grove, and setting the hearing on December 14, 1960, at 10:00 A.M., in
<br /> the C~aission Courtroom, 1~5 South Spring Street, Los Angeles,
<br />
<br />
<br />
|