Laserfiche WebLink
O8O <br /> <br /> (f) Due to the redUced Size of this <br />alternative, the envirormental, economic, Social and other <br />benefits of the Project would be obtained t6 a lesser degree. <br /> <br /> D. 2.5 FAR Alternative. :, <br /> <br /> (1) Facts. As described on, pages 6-14 through <br />6-20 of the Draft EIR, the 2.5 FAR Alternative would provide <br />for 625,000 square feet of office space and~36,200 square feet <br />of commercial space on the Project Site, representing a <br /> <br />20 percent reduction in square.footage co~pared to the proposed <br />Project. Many impacts of this alternative are similar to the <br />impacts of the Project, and traffic impacts and air quality <br />impacts would be cumulatively significant pursuant to this <br />alternative. Like the proposed Project, this alternative is <br />consistent with existing zoning and plan designations and would <br />displace the existing office uses on the Project Site. This <br />alternative will slightly reduce the visual and aesthetic <br />impacts of the Project, resulting in significant impacts. The <br />impact on public services and utilities would be similar to the <br />proposed Project in several instances, although the demand for <br />certain services would be reduced due to the smaller siz~ of <br />this Project. <br /> <br /> (2) Findings. This City Council finds that the <br />2.5 FAR Alternative is infeasible and less desirable than the <br />Project, and rejects the 2.5 FAR Alternative, for the following <br /> <br />reasons: <br /> <br /> <br />