|
"Ordinance No. NS-513 amending Article IX of the Santa Ana ~
<br /> Municipal Code to change district classification on Amend-
<br /> ment Application No. 346 and amending Sectional District
<br /> Map 4-5-9 (Exhibit AA 346 A)"
<br />
<br />initiated by the Planning Commission, to reclassify from the A-1 District to the
<br />
<br />C-1 District, property located on and surrounding the triangle of land formed by
<br />
<br />Seventeenth Street, 01d Tustin and Tustin Avenues, was considered and passed by the
<br />following vote:
<br />
<br />:Ordinance No. NS-51~
<br />iAmend. Appl. No. 347
<br />!Santa Ana Board of
<br />Realtors~.
<br />
<br />Ayes, CounciLmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.,
<br /> Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br />Noes, CounciLmen None
<br />Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Ordinance, on motion of
<br />
<br />Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the following Ordinance entitled:
<br />
<br />"Ordinance No. NS-514 amending Article IX of the Santa Ana
<br /> Municipal Code to change district classification on Amend-
<br /> ment Application No. 347 and amending Sectional District
<br /> Map 7-5-9 (Exhibit AA 347 B)"
<br />
<br />filed by the Santa Aha Board of Realtors, to reclassify from the R-1 and R-2 Dis-
<br />
<br />tricts to the C-5 District, property located on the west side of Grand Avenue, be-
<br />
<br />tween Fourteenth and Seventeenth Streets, for one lot, 66 feet wide, 680 feet south
<br />
<br />of Seventeenth Street, all as shown on Exhibit AA 327 B, and including a rezoning
<br />
<br />proposal initiated by the Planning C~maission for four lots, each 66 feet wide be-i
<br />
<br />ginning at a point 490 feet south of the center line of Seventeenth Street and con~
<br />
<br />tinuing 264 feet south, was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Communications
<br />Boundary Cc~unission,
<br />Board of Supervisors,
<br />et al
<br />
<br />Ayes, CounciLmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.,
<br /> Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br />Noes, Councilmen None
<br />Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the following com-
<br />
<br />munications were received and filed:
<br />
<br /> Fram the Boundary Ccmmnission regarding proposed annexation of territory to
<br />the City of Santa Ana "Edinger and Raitt S. E. Annex," advising the boundaries of
<br />the proposed annexation do not meet the approval of the Surveyor's office in re-
<br />spact to Section 35002 of the Government Code, and all documents were referred
<br />back to the City for correction and resubmission,
<br />
<br /> Fromthe Boundary C~ission regarding proposed annexation of territory to
<br />the City of Santa Aha "Sugar East of Ward Annex," advising the boundaries of the
<br />proposed annexation do not meet the approval of the Surveyor's office in respect
<br />to Section 35002 of the Government Code, and all documents were referred back to
<br />the City for correction and resubmission,
<br />
<br /> From the Board of Supervisors submitting copy of Minute Order, dated March 15,
<br />1961, advising City's Resolution No. 61-58 amending Resolution No. 61-27 to change
<br />back to Dyer Road the road east of Main Street heretofore named Talbert Avenue, waSl
<br />received, ordered filed, and the Clerk instructed to forward copies of said Resolu-
<br />tion to the Clerk, s Registration Department, Building Department andthe County Sur-i
<br />veyor's office,
<br />
<br />From the City of Orange submitting copy of Resolution No. 1715 proposing to
<br />2annex certain real property south of the Santa Aha Canyon Road and west of Tustin
<br /> Avenue, designated "Annexation No. 157,"
<br />
<br /> From the City of Paramount submitting copy of Resolution No. 61:033 adopted
<br />$~March 21, 1961, endorsing Assembly Bill 127 (Brown Act),
<br />
<br /> From the City of Downey submitting Resolution No. 773, adopted February 28,
<br />1961, opposing Assembly Bill No. 267 (which establishes metropolitan area multi-
<br />purpose districts), and recd,,Bending Council's consideratian of said Bill and
<br />adoptic~ of Resolution in opposition,
<br />
<br /> From the Public Relations.Director, Pacific Water Company, advising of grave
<br />coaceru over the attempts to close MacArthur Boulevard, and requesting the City
<br />Council to maintain a firm stand not to abandon said route,
<br />
<br /> From the Manager, Chamber of Commerce, submitting Resolution of Joint Meeting
<br />Highway and Airport Committees of the Santa Ana Chamber of C~m, erce relative to
<br />Orange County Airport, adopted March 22, 1961, stating that on the basis of all
<br />available information there is no Justification for the expenditure of large sums
<br />of County and Federal money in the extension of the runway length of the Orange
<br />County Airport from 5,000 feet to 5,800 feet and relocation of MacArthur Boulevard
<br />as has been advocated by the County Highway Commissioner; and further stating the
<br />County Supervisor and Airport C~mmt ssic~er agree the 5,000 foot length is adequate
<br />And have p~edged their support to curtail the longer length.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|