|
I ~ tAppeal Appl.No.22
<br /> Conditional Use Permit No.43
<br /> i Goodwill Industries
<br />
<br />Appeal Appl.No. 23
<br /> Variance Appl. No. 1481
<br /> Harold L. Wilson
<br /> ~/~
<br />
<br />Appeal Appl.No. 24
<br />Department of Public Works
<br />Conditional Use Permit No.40
<br />!Roman Catholic Archbishop
<br />of Los Angeles
<br />
<br />Appeal Application No. 22 of Goodwill Industries was presented on Conditional Use
<br />Permit No. 43, to erect an unenclosed roof structure for retail sales of products,
<br />on property approximately 144 feet by 200 feet, located 620 feet south of the south-
<br />west corner of Fifth and Fairview Streets, in the M-1 District. Applicant appealed
<br />the Zoning Administrator's denial, stating the proposed use is not comparable with
<br />any other use in the community, is of c~.~nity-wide benefit, and there were no
<br />protests to the use. Attorney Walter H. Steiner, First Western Bank Building, re-
<br />presenting the applicant, stated through an oversight his client was not present
<br />at the hearing of the Zoning Administrator, where all aspects of the proposed use
<br />of the property could have been discussed, and, in his opinion, satisfactorily re-
<br />solved. On motion of CounciLman Hubbard, seconded by Schlueter aud carried, actio~
<br />was continued to the next meeting.
<br />
<br />Appeal Applicaticm No. 23 of Harold L. Wilson, 1223 West Myrtle Street, was presen-
<br />ted on Variance Application No. 1481, to build a 24-unit apartment house on property
<br />approximately 102 feet by 300 feet, located 140 feet north of the northwest corner
<br />of Cubbon and Shelton Streets, in the R-1 District. Applicant appeals the denial
<br />of the Zoning Administrator, because it may affect the opening of a short street
<br />north of said property, and stated the size of the lot is too great for a single-
<br />family residence~ which is bounded on the north and west by M-1 and R-3 uses.
<br />Attorney Charles D. Lusin, ll80 No. Los Angeles Street, Anaheim, representing an
<br />intended buyer of the propert% stated the best development of said property would
<br />be for R-3 use, and his client would propose to construct 24 units, having 20 single
<br />and four double units. Further, an attempt had been made to purchase the parcel
<br />to the north to facilitate the extension of Brook Street east to Shelton Street,
<br />but the owner was not willing to sell, and it would not be feasible for his client
<br />to make any ccmmaitments or dedications for the opening of a street north of this
<br />property. C~mnunicatiou dated June 5, 1961 was presented from Dan L. Walker, Olsc~
<br /> 3855 Lankershim Boulevard, North Hol~vwo.od,
<br />Bros. Realty Company,/owners of adjacent property, a:rlrmlng the findings of the
<br />
<br />Zoning Administrator, and on motion of CounciLman Hubbard, seconded by Schlueter
<br />and carried, the comm~uication was received and filed. Mrs. Frances Britt, 1029
<br />
<br />W. Cubbon Street and Mrs. V i Vi an B. Gobel, lO30 W. Brook Street, objected to the
<br />
<br /> stated
<br />inadequate parking for the proposed proJect,an~bsarea would be too hazardous for
<br />
<br />the children of the additional families due to the increased traffic. Clarence H.
<br />Minery, 1002 So. Shelton Street, presented a petition with approximately 62 signa-
<br />tures in protest of the proposed construction, and on motion of Councilman Brewer,
<br />seconded by Hubbard and carried, the petition was received and filed. Harold L.
<br />Wilson, 1123 W. Myrtle Street, presented a petition with 26 signatures favoring the
<br />apartment house development, and on motion of CounciLman Hubbard, seconded by
<br />Schlueter and carried, the petition was received and filed. On motion of CounciLman
<br />Hubbard, seccaded by Brewer and carried, Appeal Application No. 23, filed by Harold
<br />L. Wilson, was denied, the recommendation of the Zoning Administrator approved, and
<br />Variance Application No. 1481 denied.
<br />
<br />Appeal Application No. 24, filed by the Department of Public Works, appealing
<br />Planning C~m~ission's deletion from their reco~m~endations of items b, d, e, f and
<br />g, as defined by the Department of Public Works' recommendations on Conditional Use
<br />Permit No. 40, filed by the Roman Catholic Archbishop ~f Los Angeles, to add one
<br />91assroom to the school facilities, on property at 1202 W. Edinger Avenue, in the
<br />
<br />
<br />
|