My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
90-098
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1990
>
90-098
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2015 1:46:21 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
90-98
Date
10/1/1990
Document Relationships
90-099
(Amended By)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\1952 - 1999\1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
42O <br /> <br />1. TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION <br /> <br />The project site is located in an area which has existing and projected circulation deficiencies <br />which will not be entirely mitigated by Planned roadway improvements. Based on the Lake <br />Center EIR traffic study, the intersections of Fairview Street/MacArthur Boulevard, and <br />Hyland Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard in Santa Ana, and 1-405/Harbor, and 1-405/Fairview <br />in Costa Mesa will operate at deficient levels of service under cumulative conditions. While <br />the proposed project would not be solely responsible for the deficient operation of these <br />intersections, it would contribute to the deficient operation of these intersections. Therefore, <br />it is considered to contribute to a cumulative significant adverse effect. Roadway <br />improvements and transportation demand management strategies will somewhat reduce traffic <br />congestion in the vicinity of the project site; however, the cumulative impact cannot be <br />altogether mitigated to a level considered leas than significant. The no project, and <br />development under existing land use designations alternatives could reduce the traffic impact <br />of the proposed project on these intersections, but not necessarily to a level considered less <br />than significant. Nor would these alternatives meet the project objectives. <br /> <br />2. AIR QUALITY <br /> <br />The air quality in South Coast Air Basin is generally poor. Cumulative development will <br />contribute to a further degradation of basin air quality and is, therefore, significant. The <br />proposed project--although consistent with the guidelines set by SCAQMD and SCAG-- <br />would contribute incrementally to the quantity of emissions intensifying this region-wkte <br />problem. Air quality regularly exceeds the federal standard in the South Coast Basin; this will <br />be the case whether the project is implemented or not. Additional feasible transportation, <br />land use, and energy conservation measures have been utilized to mitigate other negative air <br />quality impacts of the project; however, the cumulative regional impact to air quality cannot <br />be avoided if any development is permitted. Project alternatives will not alter the present air <br />quality conditions, nor are there any mitigation measures specific to the project that are <br />capable of altogether avoiding this environmental impact. <br /> <br />JB 1/08850001.ST 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.