Laserfiche WebLink
140 <br /> <br />IV. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFF'ECTS WHICH CANNOT BE <br /> <br />AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED <br /> <br />The following adverse effects cannot be completely avoided or reduced to <br />a level of Insignificance even with lmpiemehtatlon of recommended <br />mitigation measures although such measures may substantially lessen <br />impacts identified. <br /> <br />1. TRAFFIC GENERATION <br /> <br />A. Impact: <br /> <br />Project implementation will generate 2100 vehicle trips per day <br />and cumulatively contribute to areawide circulation problems In <br />conjunction with other on-going regional growth. <br /> <br />Finding: <br /> <br />(i) <br /> <br />Changes or alterations have been required in, or <br />incorporated into the project, or are otherwise being <br />Implemented which will avoid or substantially lessen the <br />significant environmental effect as Identified in the <br />Addendum to the Draft EIR, in that: <br /> <br />(a) <br /> <br />The project applicant is required to participate on a <br />fair-share basis along with other recent, pending, and <br />projected development to provide circulation <br />Improvements at locations adversely affected by the <br />project. <br /> <br />(b) <br /> <br />The project applicant is required to prepare a <br />Transportation Management Program and to participate <br />in the South Coast Metro Transportation Management <br />Association in order to promote alternative modes of <br />transportation. <br /> <br />(c) <br /> <br />The revised project represents a substantial reduction <br />in building Intensity which will generate less traffic <br />than the previously preferred project thereby reducing <br />circulation Impacts. <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />All significant environmental effects that can be feasibly <br />avoided have been eliminated or substantially lessened by <br />virtue of mitigation measures described above. <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />Other changes or alterations are within the responsibility <br />and jurisdiction of other public agencies and not solely the <br />City of Santa Ana, in that regional solutions are required to <br />address cumulative traffic/circulation problems. Other <br />responsible agencies include the surrounding local cities, the <br />County of Orange, the Southern California Association of <br />Governments, and the State of California, Including the <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br />