|
314
<br />
<br />Report from Planning
<br />Department:- Multi-
<br />story structures in
<br />urban community
<br />(Set hearing date)
<br />
<br />Proposed alley
<br />abandonment
<br />Cal Enterprises
<br />
<br />AppealAppl. No. 39
<br />Paul G. Mast~ et al
<br />Variance Appl. No. 15~0
<br />
<br />seconded by Schlueter and carried, the Vice Mayor was authorized to issue a
<br />Proclamation and copies ordered forwarded to all Cities in the County.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Ann Famularo, 2~22 South ~m~na, requested the Council to postpone action fol'
<br />two weeks, or until all Council members are present, on the adoption of the
<br />Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. NS-530 which established height limitations on
<br />buildings in certain areas. The Vice-Mayor explained that the Ordinance, if
<br />adopted, would not be effective for thirty days and the Planning Co~nission will
<br />hold a public hearing on this matter November 13, 1961. On motion of COuncilm~u
<br />Brewer, seconded by Schlueter and carried, the Clerk was instructed to publish a
<br />notice of public hearing, setting the date on November 20, 1961, to establish
<br />height limitations on buildings. On motion of Counci!man Brewer, seconded by
<br />Schlueter and carried, the report entitled "The Proper Place of M~lti-St~ry
<br />Structures in an Urban Community", from the Planning Department, was received and
<br />filed.
<br />
<br />Co~maunication was presented from the Planning Con~nission recom~aending approval of
<br />the proposed abandonment of the north and south -~ l ey in Block "F" South Santa An~,
<br />as requested by Cai Enterprises, who stated the abandonment was requested in orde~
<br />to ~! low them to make full use of the land between the east line of Main Street a~d
<br />the west line of Cypress Avenue, as the ~!~ey does not now exist on the ground,
<br />has never been improved, and has never been used as an a]ley; said approval of
<br />the proposed vacation of the alley is made provided the owner, prior to approval
<br />of the vacation, agrees to certain provisions. Larry Golden, Civil Engineer, llO
<br />West First Street, representing Cai Enterprises, stated they are willing to give
<br />assurance that these lots will not be sold individ,,a~lly where an alley will be
<br />necessary and are agreeable to reverting this property to acreage. On motion of
<br />Councilman Brewer, seconded by Sohlueter and carried, action was continued until
<br />the next meeting.
<br />
<br />Appeal Application No. 39 ~f Paul G. Mast, George L. Moore, and A. L. Ramirez,
<br />was presented on Variance Application No. 1540, to establish a retail pharmacy ati
<br />180~ North Broadway, in the "~" District, and do so with less than required off-
<br />street parking, or B6 parking spaces for the entire building, wherein Appellant
<br />appeals the denial of the Zoning Administrator. Attorney Paul G. Mast, 811 Nort~
<br />Broadway, stated it was proposed to build a two-story office building prior to
<br />filing Variance Application No. 1540, and after the plans were completed and the
<br />matter approved by the Planning Department, the present owner of the property,
<br />
<br />Mr. A. L. Ramirez, ll41 West Pmrk Lane, indicated he was desirous of conducting a
<br />pharmacy in the proposed office building. ~r. Mast objected to the denial of
<br />the Variance Application by the Zoning A~m~uistrator for the reason this will noti
<br />be a commercial type pharmacy, but a professional pharmacy; this type of pharmacy
<br />should not require more parking spaces than other offices in the building, and
<br />the parking area allotted originally for the building would be sufficient. Mr.
<br />
<br />F. J. Parke, 2230 North Broadway, objected to the granting ~f this Variance as it
<br />would leave this area open to other com,,ercial type businesses, and a pharmacy is!
<br />established within 200 feet of the proposed building. ~r. George L. Moore, 122~
<br />Ranchwood Road, Santa Aha, stated many of the ~octors have expressed a desire for
<br />a pharmacy of. this type in the area. Mrs. W. B. Treadwell, 1920 Victoria Drive,
<br />stated she favored the ~ffice building, but objected to the establishment of a
<br />pharmacy as it would Jeopardize their property. On motion of Councilman Brewer,
<br />
<br />
<br />
|